Maybe Jafco is not so nice.
I received an email form Jafco saying that even he believes in free speech, still insisting that my comments needs to be immediately retracted, he believes it is a deformation and threatening with compensation. He explained that what he describes in his document is his findings and that he wasn’t aware abut similar explanations of similar principles in other books or public forums. I’ll not publish his email since he didn’t asked me to do so, and I personally think it is degrading. But I will publish my answer.
Someone I know well told me that you’ve called my computer a dinosaurs compared to yours PDA which makes someone dishonest. Even Mark Howe admitted after 15 years selling PDA’s and mobiles as roulette computers that they are useless. He has on his site that they are useless, I have written disadvantages on FF roulette computers especially on talking FFA. Do you have on yours? If not don’t you think someone may purchase it without understanding? Actually who am I to give you lessons on ethics?
I also believe in free speech, so I speak my opinion, and it is not as you described because for long, there were not discussion about your subject. If you mean long that I said something about few years ago then again recently it doesn’t mean it is my job do to something as that but that in each discussion about same subject I have same opinion. If my opinion doesn’t match your expectations I cannot help with that.
It is interesting that you send me an email and not correcting anything that I wrote about your system, but explaining why it is as I have said. Obviously you very well know that each point I explained is correct. It is a forum thread, open for discussion, as you can see there are arguments representing different opinions. You would be correct complaining if in any way I edited the posts which do not support my arguments but I did not.
Someone else said, “I appreciate his resent publications, not the outdated ones.”
What does it mean? Same as I have said, but he also speaks positive about it, leaving impression that it is worth buying it, especially updated version. Did I remove hi opinion because it doesn’t suit mine, did I tried to force him to change his opinion as you trying to do? Of course I did not. It stays there for general public information. Someone may have your system read what I wrote and if it is dishonest or wrong it would only compromise myself, isn’t it. It is not a deformations as you believe but if you still think that it is and that you are entitled for compensation, there is nothing I can do for you. Rest is up to you.
It is ridicules from you to expect me to change my opinion or immediately retract my comments as you asked me to, but you are welcome to argue it or to write your opinion at the forum. Just don’t expect me to agree. If you want I can add your email to the post as your opinion however I believe it is not right to make any threats or pressure on someone that didn’t say a single wrong and manipulative thing about your system. The only one making manipulation to public is yourself with videos about accuracy of prediction which do not even closely represent reality of real casino play.
How can you say for constructive criticism and logic explanation of facts be too far? I never used word “plagiarist” but only explained that what you described in your system was already described. That relates to two diamonds overlap, identifying tilted wheel, understanding tilted wheel affect, and targeting particular ball rotation for prediction. If that is known and used then what is new?
We call it a traditional VB, and I didn’t meet a single VB player who were not already familiar with all of that. I am sorry but if you decided to divide year to 12 months 52 weeks and 365 days without knowing that it is already in use, it doesn’t mean that it is your calendar but Romans. How I can be wrong if saying it is already done by Romans? Somewhere in primary school as advanced mathematician I discovered sign and cosign, didn’t take me long to lean that it is already in use. Lucky I didn’t publish a book about it.
Why do you think I cannot say that if I read your document and already know everything since it is already explained in other documents or even public forums, that I am disappointed because it is only an explanation of something already explained? Some people say it is a nice explanation, I don’t argue, since it is a nice explanation. I also believe it is your own explanation and not copied. Simple as that.
My disappointment is because you advertised it as a something new. If you were not familiar with any publications on the subject as you explained that you’ve discovered it by yourself it is new only for yourself but not for the public to which you were selling it. Now when you know it is not new will you rectify the mistake? If not, does it mean you prefer sales instead of the truth?
I’ve never said that your cards were used before however I do have my negative opinion on them.
and any losses were from profit i made from the vb hit that worked :)[/quote]