What better prove you want

Advanced roulette play
1

Thanks for the PM and link i’ll publish it, so let’s all enjoy.

Feel sorry for Stefano only because he bought prototype program, (before then I made note to everyone to upgrade because of error in program). Shit happens when you work on program and when you did not have time to use it in casino. (I love ffz) it only tells us how is important to be a player and user of the device to make it right.
Accuracy (time of prediction) should start with A, 16,15,14,13,12,…3, so for prediction you can select any rotation you want where A is unlimited. Obviously nobody told him ;).

Can expect everything form Stefano.
First time he pretended to be someone else cried how he lost all money with Stefano’s system and I sent him one FFZ for free.
He used it to try to show how FFZ is unpractical, but after some people analysed spins it was showing hit rate of 1:15

Now he is trying to discredit FFA and made a video

http://www.roulettecomputers.com/ffa.wmv

Actually video is not bad, but his clocking sucks badly. ( probably trying to make more errors, but to add and some inaccuracy) Watch some spins he start clocking ball at 3 o clock and each rotation clicks it earlier by few cm. On the end when system predicts it’s clocked it at 12 o clock.
Considering that it is real levelled wheel prediction and not manipulation he does with his tilted wheel program (he has only one program for tilt and level) and that predictions are very early in time, I classify video as positive.

It’s nice advertisement, people with brain will love it.
Wondering why he did not make test to predict 5-6 rotations before ball drop, with his computer (with viper and bago) he cheats plus predicts 3-4 rotations before drop.
28,29,7,35 most of predictions on any clocking position , If you have had doubts can FFA really predict levelled wheel, now you know it can, Stefano proved it and even at 8-9 rotations before then the ball drops.

I am upset only because he is showing how device looks. He has no respect for users.
One day if he finds way to get FFZ-new he wouldn’t be able to show it because it’s to small ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D.

2

HAHAHAHAHA I love it,ooo and didn’t the FFa predict 0 also???

LOL AND THE COMPUTER SHOUTING TO THE WHOLE OF THE WORLD ERROR 4

To MEMEBRS OF THE PUBLIC ILL EXPLAIN WHAT THE COMPUTER IS TELLING THE PLAYER

ERROR 4 alerts the player of a specific ball speed which the player must avoid (hence players get no prediction) in basic training one of the first thing we learn here at THE forum is to set the system as accurately as we can. Now even the most professional users here will never be 100% sure if they’ve set the system for the best results…

But as the computer Finley tunes it self it becomes aware (through players input and clocking style) of which ball speeds to stay clear of IF PLAYER RECIEVES ERROR 4 1-6 then this is a sign he has set the system wrong or at least not at its best OR bad cl coking will also produce system to give the audio warning ERROR 4 ( this was the prototype which forester did ask all users to check,within minutes of testing long time user of FFa-u and close friend of mine Manuelon and myself noticed and reported our findongs here at the forum)

LMAO , well done steve not bad me old china not bad at all :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:

your cloking was so bad that NOT EVEN you could FOOL THE FFA-U hahahaha what a loser really

but when FFA-U did accept your clcoking it produced very constant and stable results considering there was no offset done

There is one thing I will say in your favour ,In court when you got sent to prison you actually did nt lie when they asked you about your qualifications job etc,YOU replied that you where a promoter . well on that video you sure did prove THAT THEN :wink: :wink: :wink:

@forester PLEASE let him have access to the new program …the February one ,go on mate I want to see him do more demo videos just like that one
hahahaha

OK Ive st oped laughing now

so whats scammer stevs name now,MARTIAN STEVE i THINK THATS APPROPRAIATE AS HE DOESNT RESEMABLE ANYTHING HUMAN IVE EVER SEEN

OK Secman over and out ,I got more important things to do than waist my time over this joke

OK and BTW the offer still stands if any of the public would care to contact me OR for a live demo of the FFa-u in action then contact me here at the forum…also check here at the forum on video demos of myself in action with FFa-u …The first 2 videos where done with prototype and the title clearly states HOW NOT TO SET THE FFa-u roulette computer ,next 2 videos show FFa-u in action with system tuned and showing full advantage of point set and showing what the bad spin should look like and alerting the player

OK PPL enjoy yourself

Regard to you all

Securityman :-* :-*

3

@forester
Bearing in mind this was prototype, and correct me if I’m wrong, but in basic training you told me if I’m getting error 4 like stev is getting that (if player has set system well) this could also be an indication that wheel has a tilt(ball is travelling uphill/downhill) and player should go back to menu select tiltted program and test to see how the settings work with tilted program???

My point being this FFa-u ,you know and I know it would produce far better results than stev got

so this tells me that wheel was tilted AND there was bad clocking taking place for all to see on HIS video footage???

4

Error 4 is only for tilted wheel, if you remember that is the problem with first version of program, I sent note to everyone with my apology to upgrade. Error 4 shouldn’t happen with IQE6, it belongs to tilt2 program when ball is not going to hit DD.

Since Stefano is not aware of it’s obvious that he was lying how he has players of FFA using his computer as well. Someone would explain to him and give him corrected program version. He again shut himself in a foot and caught lying. Now he knows so he can (if he can) upgrade computer then he will not have error4.

Yes, even his rotor clocking was so bad he miskicks by 2 pockets, of course that would cause results to shift ~10 pockets.

Maybe his motoric shills are retarded. That may be the reason why he wasn’t accepted to join army when he applied.
They test people for reflexes.

Interesting is how he made FF video, claims his computer is better comparing it to his imaginary results but never made real video of his computer to prove it. Video which can be accepted that he did not cheat again. When he tried to convince Viper in same, when viper told him ok I want you to do that but I want to see your both hands and computer on screen, Stefano’s computer gave completely random predictions.

He blamed everyone for that, but the truth is clear, Viper only wanted the best posiable predictions , same as anybody else, it is never truth that all people just hate him and love me. People look and compare products.

5

[i]"When he tried to convince Viper in same, when viper told him ok I want you to do that but I want to see your both hands and computer on screen, Stefano’s computer gave completely random predictions.

He blamed everyone for that, but the truth is clear, Viper only wanted the best posiable predictions , same as anybody else, it is never truth that all people just hate him and love me. People look and compare products."[/i]

[b]Exactly!
And this was the only reason that I accepted to make the test with Stefano.
To see him cheating and inform all ppl.
If Forester say that Stefano is not OK ,then he is not OK…I never had doubts.
But Forester is a in the RC buziness too,so some ppl may think that he is just discrecing him just to have more clients by blocking Stefano clients.
But a neutural person like me count more for ppl.Because I had nothing to earn from it.

The only thing that bothered me was that Forester did not trust my Knowledje in VB and RC calculation…and he thought that Stefano could cheat without me to understand it.[/b]

Maybe Stefano is scamming ppl.
But the Viper is the Viper! :wink:

I would like also to say something in public that Forester has misunderstood.
When we were talking through mails with Forster before the Stefano demostration to me,Forester was afraid that Stefano may cheat in the demostration without me to notice it.(this was what made me sad)
So I teased by telling him : “Oh I think that U are afraid that maybe Stefano RC may be better than FF…so all this time U were lying that Stefano RC is giving Random predictions”
Forester thinks till today that I was sirious when I told it…
I hope that now he understood that it was teasing,because he didn t trust my knowledje. ;D

6

Well that is just the internet for you. I fear typing over the internet and communicating with what is my second language English simply because things might be said in a lite way but received in a heavy way! Without face to face or voice to voice, conversations are often misunderstood or misinterpreted.

Then again I would of felt exactly the same as Forester if you told me what you told him. I mean there are so many two-faced people, especially on the net, with various different names and agendas that who do you trust?

There are guys going around (who are clearly fakes and bullshitters) that every second day they find the HG. They go under different names and make crazy claims and string people along for weeks and months, wasting people’s time. These people are so easy to spot because although they create so many different characters with false names, their writing style stays the same…it is a dead give away.

So who to trust …who to trust…

7

Forester,

I just checked Stefano’s graphs. What an idiot, even if newbies believe he tested correctly, who on earth would buy a device 6500$ more expensive than one at around 1000$ whereas both have the same results?. Yours in 11 pockets sector and his 9 pockets sector, but we know for the other two diamonds test Stefano had predictions within a 12 pockets sector.

Also your predictions are far better than his when clocking two opposite diamonds. You got results right next to each other in a 3 pockets sector, and his in a 9 pockets sector (he forgot to add a dot at number 17 just because yours gave error lol)

Stefano used tilted setup for his computer, meaning that the bad rotor clocking didn’t have so much importance for his phone comparing to FF which was setup for level wheel.

Despite this cheat, your device equals Stefano’s shit in this unfair testing.

My congratulations.

8
just checked Stefano's graphs. What an idiot, even if newbies believe he tested correctly, who on earth would buy a device 6500$ more expensive than one at around 1000$ whereas both have the same results?.

It is not $6500 more, with all features of FFA he asks for about $20,000,
I can live with that but I know he has no chance to achieve same results as FFA can. You have had his computer and you know that it couldn’t do 10% of what he claimed.

He made video of his phone predicting single spin, it is about 6th video with same thing, on all previous ones he screwed somewhere so he removed it.
This time he thinks he did not make mistake, but he did huge one where everyone can see that he is cheating. It is laughable. I’ll explain it in about one month time, let him first brag around forums.

I simply do not understand why he is so obsessed about me, for 5 years he wants to prove how he made ok computer better then Forester’s one. But he never made real prove except bragging around how he did.

Stefano promised to show computer to PJ to test it on a real wheel, delayed him and played with him for 3 months on the end he said instead of real demo he will show him only a video. Then he blames PJ for refusing to see it.

Tried to cheat on Viper,

Screwed up with Bago

Lying that I refused to see his computer when I was in Melbourne, and that I insisted that he has to show me his computer inside his house. It is really ridiculous.

Promised to send Computer to Laurance

Bragg around forums how he will send it to Snowman so he can test it

It never happened, only empty promises.

If someone wants to prove something on the net then he needs to be transparent.
He needs to do in testing what people ask him to do, not make his own version of something and avoid to do what someone askes him to do.

I said many times “4 diamonds test” is designed for user not for system seller because it can be manipulated.

Bago and Viper, why he doesn’t show you on camera predictions on a real wheel, so you can tell the world his great achievements? He claims computer makes huge advantage in casinos, predicting own wheel at home will be easier. If he has so good prediction it will be noticed after 20 spins.

Or even better, since you are one of his unhappy customers, why he doesn’t send you $50 phone, limit software for one month and you do all tests. He can guide you and help you if you make mistake. Of course he will never do it instead he will spend hours and days on net, attacking me, you or anybody else, and at same time claim how he is busy man with no time for real demonstration.

9

I agree 100% with what you wrote because it is 100% the truth.

Firstly, Stefano didn’t use the crockshit he sent me for 5000$. If he wanted to show people i used his phone incorrectly, then he had to install the version I had. The version he used to sell worked with either 2,3,4 or 5 ball clicks, and the computer made the calculations over those ball clicks (Like Mark howe computer).
Also you are right, Stefano controlled everything during the demo, when asked to delay rotor by 1 revolution, he said at the beginning “no problem”, but when i asked him to do it during the demonstration, he got angry and said: “stick to what is relevant”. LOL

Now, he completely changed his algorythms, since he copied exactly what you use with FF, that is to say clicking ball revolutions until the computer detects one specific revolution.
Wow, do you need to change how your computer proceeds when you promoted that your first version obtained a 1 in 16 hit rate on level wheels???. lol
And he stated that at this time, his computer got all predictions in a 12 pockets sector WHEREAS IT IS WHAT HE OBTAINS FOUR YEARS LATER THANKS TO YOUR IDEA WITH HIS CURRENT VERSION!.

SO NOW EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT MY TEST WITH MY PC PLAYER WAS CORRECTLY DONE . Four years back with his poor version, his computer gave predictions everywhere.

Also you are again right about Stefano’s bluff. He had to send a computer to Snowman because Stefano recognized he knows what he is talking about concerning Roulette. But Caleb told me Stefano was not going to send him a computer, instead Stefano wanted to send him a DVD.

Concerning him sending me a phone: I don’t want to go to jail for wearing a product that does not work in real casino conditions. Stupid Stefano wrote many times how is computer is covert because it can erase the software if you get caught, but he does not explain how he removes the earpiece, the induction loop plugged to the phone, and also the switch button cable linked to the phone. And he thinks it is not suspiscious. lol. Maybe he told his scammed purchasers to say that they are talking in “morse” that’s why they need a button switch cable.
And also i don’t want to wait one week to have an activation code to unlock it. That’s his delay because as you said, he is very busy but find time to write a bible concerning us.

And yes, i already asked him to do a demonstration against his new huxley wheel. I wanted to see him predicting before the wheel and ball are spun with his most powerful method he found in nature. He completely ignored it. :smiley:

10

[quote=“Toxic, post:6, topic:518”]Then again I would of felt exactly the same as Forester if you told me what you told him. I mean there are so many two-faced people, especially on the net, with various different names and agendas that who do you trust?

There are guys going around (who are clearly fakes and bullshitters) that every second day they find the HG. They go under different names and make crazy claims and string people along for weeks and months, wasting people’s time. These people are so easy to spot because although they create so many different characters with false names, their writing style stays the same…it is a dead give away.

So who to trust …who to trust…[/quote]

Hey Toxic strong words softly spoken

youve only been here a short time ,but your already starting to talk like an OLDTIMER ;D ;D(COUGH ::))

I totally agree with you

your mate

Secman

11

[attachimg=1]

Hey Forester!

Our big clown did another test. Sadly for him it is again in our favour.

Again, he confirmed that his computer does not predict within a 3 pockets arc, like his fake independant tester Ronjo found. Instead and like i already stated, it predicts within a 12 pockets sector which is clearly not enough accurate to beat modern level wheels.

Also, his claims that his computer can predict which diamond the ball will hit and even the part of it has been proven to be completely garbage. A computer predicting in a 12 pockets arc on the same spin cannot even predict which vertical diamond the ball will hit since vertical diamonds are separated by 90° which is around 9 pockets.

His picture shows that your computer gets more accurate and stable predictions. Indeed, we see the four dots 29-7-28-12 which is the main sector, next to each other. The other predictions are due to bad clocking and thus shift (not next to each other)
Also the opposite predictions are exactly 18 pockets away from the main sector, which clearly shows FF calculations are very good.

Now for fat pig computer: We cannot say where is the main area of the predictions. (5,24,16) and we have also (1,14,31) which is not good, contrary to FF predictions which shows a main area is defined and some predictions are shifting due to bad clicks, we see the logic in the picture.

Now very important: Exactly in the demonstration he did with me, Stefano’s computer opposite predictions are NOT accurate. Indeed, the center of his predictions are at number 33, and the opposite of it is: number 19. Problem is all his opposite predictions are located in the left side, whereas it should be the center of the opposite predictions.
Exactly the same problem in the demonstration he did with me, where the main predictions were around zero sector and he got prediction number 1 several times for the opposite predictions which is not accurate.

FF does it right, Stefano’s computer does it wrong. FF device is far cheaper and more accurate, Stefano’s phone is far more expensive and less accurate. It seems he can’t stand it.

FF can announce predictions at any ball revolution clocked, this way you do not stay on a possible inaccurate prediction due to bad clocking on a single ball revolution. Stefano’s computer does not have this IMPORTANT feature whereas he claims he is the roulette master and that FF is simplistic junk, everybody laugh at him.
But of course, soon he will add this feature and say he has the right to copy the idea because it is Basieux or someone else who gave you the idea. Stefano is such a plaggiarist fraudster.

Stefano criticizes others’knowledge about roulette whereas this moron has been caught writing rubbish about his new velstone huxley wheel and Snowman had to correct him on all points.

The pig is roasted.

12
Again, he confirmed that his computer does not predict within a 3 pockets arc, like his fake independant tester Ronjo found. Instead and like i already stated, it predicts within a 12 pockets sector which is clearly not enough accurate to beat modern level wheels.

Well you know very well that Ronjo story is just another of his scams. He removed all old posts to hide reality how stupid it was. Yes it is truth with that he completely contradicts himself. Stefano is dreaming to convince you or me or someone that at list will get 1:12. No he can not, even for that he cheats, we all are familiar video editing. Once you come to MSN I’ll explain to you so you can have good laugh.

I think main point here is that he proved that FFA really works on levelled wheel, he tested it outside of specification (only dumb person can do it) , but results are still reasonable. If prediction wasn’t 7,8,or 9 rotations before ball drop but 5-6 results would be much better. Also it was a prototype program. The program was mixing some calculations in between tilt 2 and IQE6, that is why he is getting some miscalculations also “error 4” when nobody else can get it. Every user of FFA knows it.

With his new videos he thinks that he can make video about his computer can do same and that people will believe him. It is his sixth video about “4D TEST” that he made, and they all were scam.

It is so stupid to make video and to claim it is a prove. But that’s what Stefano is doing for past 5 years. There is no single person who said FF in his hands can’t do same as what I did on video, with Stefano’s computer, nobody could create advantage, all people we know were scammed.

You too, it may surprise you, but you were scammed, did you get 200% money back, you remember Stefano’s words, he can do it because no single person ever complains. So he still needs to pay you $,5000. You have legal rights to get it back.

If someone is interesting send me $200 for my 2 hours of work and I will make you a video where FFA predicts every time 100% perfectly. :smiley: (not 12 pocket not 3 pockets arch but 1 pocket, each time) I know it is sick that’s why I do not waste my time, but if you are stupid and have so much money to give away I’ll make it for you. 8)
If someone is interested i will make him and video how i fly as Suprtrman all over Australia. ;D ;D ;D

13

Stefano has nowhere to go. He has demonstrated several times that his computer predicts in a 12 pockets arc, which is no coincidence.
Now, to escape from those poor results which give random results for the final winning number on any given spin in the real casino environment, he wants people to believe that 1 in 12 is the hit rate his computer obtains on modern wheels!!!

His so called proof is his computer can predict which diamond the ball will hit, and particularly the one which gives less ball scatter.
But at the same time he has proven through his demonstrations that his computer cannot possibly achieve it since the margin error for the prediction is simply too large (around 12 pockets) and vertical diamonds are separated by 90° (9 pockets). It means that even on the same spin, with the same reference diamond for the clocking, on one occasion it will predict 12 o’clock vertical diamond, and on another repeated spin, it will predict 3 o’clock vertical diamond.
Therefore, as everybody can realize, his lies are very obvious. Also the lies do not stop there, on his comparison page (FF vs his phone), he claims that his computer is able to predict which part of the striked diamond the ball will hit!!! The guy is a fruitcake.

Without the willing to do so, this imbecile has proven through his demonstrations that his computer has no value, random against a modern wheel, and he has proven also that his advertisement is also fraudulent, manipulative to scam people.

FF is able to give multiple predictions during the spin, each time a click is made for the ball, assuring the user that his prediction is accurate.
Stefano’s phone does not have this important feature, it is so poor that it predicts only 1 time when the key revolution is reached, and give predictions in a 12 pockets arc. And this crook dares to sell that shit for 7,500$. FF is much more advanced and is sold much cheaper (around 1000$).

So there is no debate about which device is superior. The only superiority Stefano’s phone has is the PRICE.

His scam business is really OVER, nobody is supporting him, excepted the old fool “Spike” which suffers from schizophrenia, and everybody are laughing at him with his guessing story.

Now Stefano is roasted, the only way he has found to prove that his computer works is writing on his blog that his technicians and himself are overwhelmed because too many people are ordering his computer. If i remember well, around 40 computers. Same for his paper system, he is doing a discount for a limited time and ask people to act promply because “this chance” won’t last long (in a few days it is finished). Lol, it’s been more than one month that this advertisment is there, and it will be for a long time to come.

The guy is desperate and his scam touched to the end and i am more than glad like everyone that it finishes this way.

14

It is obvious,

Since you are long time on forums, did you notice how his computer has delay in pronouncing number? He clocks the ball with last click and it takes computer one second to start talking, with FF it is instant. It means he was lying that he fixed that problem and that firmware is modified so mobile phone is able to have full advantages as FF does.

Every time he makes his videos he screws something else and proves how he was lying. I do not understand how he can even imagine that video is a prove of something, in average every 6 months he start repeating same story, obviously he has no common sense.

Do you remember when few years back he was saying I am not an engineer and 4D test is useless? Now he is struggling to prove that his computer can pass it, can you imagine what I can think about him.
On none of his videos you coud see team of his engineers (he claims he has) doing the tests, but Stefano himself, with his ball clocking skill far less than an average.

I simply do not care what he is doing; my point in this thread is that Stefano with video proved once more how FFA is a great helpfull tool.

Imagine Mark Howe takes Stefano’s roulette computer and shows to all world that it really does all what Stefano was saying. Stefano would be the happiest man. 8)

15

Thanx for the support secman! You are a standup guy.

I must get a new metronome though…the OLD TIMER just does not quite work…

@ Bago and Forester.

I have always believed that Stefano is a fraud and ascam artist. I have to tell you though that Ronjo is not a made up tester. I know who Ronjo is and he is a fellow countryman. Genuine stand up guy. He is in the Natal region. I still want to meet up with him.

So however Stefano cheated he did cheat but then it would of been a clever method that Ronjo didn’t spot.

I told Steve that I would contact Ronjo and ask him for the spins that Ronjo tested the computer on. He turned around and said he couldn’t trust me and that he would prohibit Ronjo of showing me the spins. :smiley: What does that tell you?

I checked his other DVD’s where he tests his cpu’s. And wheels that are suppose to be level or semi-level … You see on the DVD’s how the ball stationary in a pocket rolls from the one side of the pocket to the other side as the wheel rotates…again what does that tell you? I have never seen that in a casino.

Anyhow Steve is one smart scam artist. That you cannot deny him. Wonder how he pulled the wool over Ronjo’s eyes. I tell you this though I vouch 100% for Ronjo.

Cheers
Toxic

16
I told Steve that I would contact Ronjo and ask him for the spins that Ronjo tested the computer on. He turned around and said he couldn't trust me and that he would prohibit Ronjo of showing me the spins. :D What does that tell you?
Nothing new, that is what he is doing all the time.

I do not know anyone who after test was able to talk with Ronjo.
Stefano was writing posts and posts but there wasn’t any explanation form ronjo.
Only one line published at Stefano’s forum under Ronjos name.

I know some people who use to talk with him, but he is gone.
At that time Stefano made so stupid description of test and claimed that he did my test.
I explained it on VLS but now he removed it.

He started understanding full test only after he come here and pretended to be Marvin so I explained him details, that is why now he is trying to be smart.
I mean how much is worth as a prove video made by someone especially as Stefano. If I counted right It is his sixth one about same subject. He did nto even use lava lamp.
I can make video of FFA predicting with single pocket accuracy, it doesn’t mean that system can really do it. I can make video of me flying, it doesn’t mean I really can do it. Videos i publish are for people who have device, or for someone to get an idea how it works, but it never can be a prove.

I am really not for games, what I should do now, make video FFA predicts each spins perfectly and say he was lying. I watched his video only because someone gave me link to watch. He showed reasonable FFA predictions, if he followed procedure and have had finished program he would have and better results without E4. It is obvious to everyone that Stefano wouldn’t cheat to make FFA working, therefore it is a prove that FFA predicts ok.

If Stefano wants to prove something about his computer he knows that he needs to do proper prove and he is constantly avoiding it. Wondering if he will ever got tired of repeating same every 6 months. :slight_smile:

17

Ronjo or Ronnie was in an accident and was on the mend for a long time.

That is why he kinda vanished.

He is back on another forum. I most pobably could get into contact with him if need be.

Cheers
Toxic

18

@ Toxic

Ronjo and Toxic are stand up guys theyre to be trusted

but owners of forums can do exactly how they please

forester can see all on forum PMs delete posts modify posts, or, post as you or me

so in the hands of a scammer and ex criminal sefano anything looks possible

bago i beleive caught stefano playing childish game and pretented to be RONJO

maybe bago has still got the proof

I just wandered why one of THE most respected persons(Lanky) in the roulette world pulled out of testing stevs computer

19

Simple, Stefano was making impassable conditions and always alternate them, until Lanky gave up.

If he wants to make videos and has so much free time then why he doesn’t make it at least as a reasonable prove.

Someone can pass him this homework.

Use roulette spin and play it on TV.
Place mobile phone computer in front of screen to be seen all the time, connect it with cable to switch.
On the other side place lava lamp, so viewer can see that videos frames are not edited.
Set computer

Part A
Clock rotor at 12 o clock ball at 12 prediction about 7 rotations before ball drops = result
Clock rotor at 12 o clock ball at 9 prediction about 7 rotations before ball drops = result
Clock rotor at 12 o clock ball at 3 prediction about 7 rotations before ball drops = result
Repeat part A 3 times in same order.

Part B test his claim computer can predict in any rotation.
Clock rotor at 12 o clock ball at 12 prediction about 5rotations before ball drops = result
Clock rotor at 12 o clock ball at 9 prediction about 5 rotations before ball drops = result
Clock rotor at 12 o clock ball at 3 prediction about 5 rotations before ball drops = result
Repeat part B 3 times so we can see systems linearity.

Since he claims his computer predicts levelled wheel 15 rotations before ball drops then
Clock rotor at 12 o clock ball at 12 prediction about 12 rotations before ball drops = result
Clock rotor at 12 o clock ball at 9 prediction about 12 rotations before ball drops = result
Clock rotor at 12 o clock ball at 3 prediction about 12 rotations before ball drops = result

Now repeat test A , can use same spin but select anticlock ball way direction (he claims that his computer now can predict both ball directions same as FF can). In previous videos he never showed it and in casino dealers alternate ball direction.

Make video nice and clean for viewing so we can see and position where he clocks.

I’ll give him some credit for that. Last time I suggest him the test he become mad but it is really simple and genuine offer.

20

@Toxic

Thanks for the support. Stefano believes only me and Forester dislike him. WE are the only one saying it publicly that the pig is a scammer, you also now but the majority of people who believe the same simply does not want to write it, like Snowman, Laurance… for example.

Let me clarify something about Ronjo the African: How can you tell that he is not Stefano since you admit that you never meet him for real?.
Just because the guy posted as Ronjo and said lives in South Africa is enough to say that he is who he says he is?.
Also if you read my website, you will see screenshot of Stefano posting as “Ronjo” in his own message board. And like a coincidence, this “Ronjo” was the one chosen by Stefano to test his computer.
And another coincidence, Stefano refused to send his phone to anyone else, including Snowman who is smart when it comes to Roulette and is for real.
Another coincidence is the fact Stefano claimed his computer predicts within 3 pockets arc when doing the 4 diamonds test, and Ronjo said EXACTLY the same WHERAS IT WAS A LIE.

I know Stefano’s behaviour more than anyone else, and i know to which extent the guy is prepared to go to sell his scams.
To give you an idea how dishonest and crooked the guy is: Before purchasing his 5000$ computer, he told me to have me convinced his device worked that a guy living in Isra «l didn’t have enough money to buy a new kidney to his wife who was going to die if not cured. He told me: I would never sell my computer to someone in this situation if i knew my computer didn’t work.
At this time, his computer predicted everywhere on the same repeated spin.

Stefano is a completely immoral person.