The bet is still the same value but the odds have altered in my favour
Betting one column the odds are 2:1 against you, betting two columns the odds are 2:1 in your favour
Simply, if you put a bet on one column there are 12 numbers in your favour and 25 against you (including zero)
If you bet two columns then there are 24 numbers in your favour and 13 against you
This is a very simplistic outline of my system, but I assure you it works
100 spins of the wheel would return 400 units
Using your logic, then why not bet every number?
In reality, you’re betting two column and have a chance of winning of 24/37 (12/38 on a 00 wheel) for a payoff that’s only 35 to 1
In other words, the house edge is still there.
Snowman
The reason i play zero is because it covers my bet especially if the bets a little on the large side, if I hit zero then I can repeat
This is the game I am currently playing…see if the maths add up
Anybody can win money, very few can avoid losing it
And yes, as you will no doubt point out, one of those lines will eventually hit the table limit
the really clever part of this system is knowing how to avoid that ever happening
Apparantly I no longer have the option to remove my topic, which is strange
Anyway you now have all the numbers to open the safe, unfortinately you still don’t have the combination
This is only a part of my system, the question now is
If I can avoid hitting the table limit, which I can, will the system work ???
Correct me if I am wrong, but it just looks like an up as you lose progression, but you are betting everything. The higher your bet size becomes, the more you stand to win. So, in order to win, you want to lose for a bit to get your bets high enough to turn a profit. But you have to win before you hit the table max. You do realize that dozens/columns have been known to sleep for 20+ spins right?
The problem with these types of systems is that they work okay up until the point where they don’t. Sure the times that you are going to hit a bad streak and hit the max, and still lose, won’t happen all that often. But it will happen as often enough to destroy your bankroll. Just because something is unlikely, doesn’t mean it cant happen. Especially with roulette. I don’t quite see how your system overcomes the house edge and could be profitable over the long term. I have been known to be a little slow on the uptake though.
[quote=“Dragen, post:42, topic:920”]Snowman
The reason i play zero is because it covers my bet especially if the bets a little on the large side, if I hit zero then I can repeat
This is the game I am currently playing…see if the maths add up
Just looks like a fancy progression, spreading the risk around so you don’t hit table limit.
Thing about progressions man, the’re wonderful when they work but costly as all hell when they don’t. I had a progression on PKR going to nearly 2 months while i played poker which covered all my tourney entries, until you get 13 reds in a row then you’re kinda fucked lol.
EDIT: Also, you ever considered using a no-zero roulette wheel? will give back that extra few %
I have seen Dozens and columns lose more than 20 in a row but that is where the system comes into it’s own
I have worked out how to avoid hitting the table limit no matter how many times a row fails to hit
wheter the win is big or small the average is still 4 per spin, I can adjust that though with the progression
As someone said, it is just a fancy progression system but one that does not hit the table limit
I just wanted to show that it is possible to beat a ball and wheel roulette table
This is a forum and we have had a good debate on the merits of my system
Some believe it will work some believe it won’t, everyone is entitled to their opinion
I have displayed most of my system, I have laid out the progression for everyone to see, which shows it works
The maths add up
It is up to individuals as to whether they believe it or not
Your raising and lowering of the bets, and the hedging that you are doing by betting the zero, still hasn’t changed the long term expectation.
In fact, betting the zero is adding to your long term loss by increasing the amount of money that you are exposing to the house edge.
“Pics or it didn’t happen.” Translation: Prove it!
I don’t need a picture of your account balance, but describing why you are able to beat the house edge is a start. There needs to be a reason why it works. And that reason should be measurable.
