Laurance is different, for him I know that he understands and that he made money.
Jafco comes 20 years after Laurance, makes Google advertisement as an expert having the best VB system, as a 3rd dimension of roulette, when he even doesn’t explain what LS was explaining 20 years ago.
I got his original DVD form same person who bought and his computer. Anybody can make some flash files and explain VB principles then sell it as his system.
I looked it and couldn’t even define it as a system. It is actually less than traditional principles of VB.
The only extra he did is make cards for retarded, as I already explained earlier.
Any VB player, will somehow clock rotor.
Did Jafco bring something new. I do not see anything, except cards he made as an additional help. Of course nobody will ever use it in casino. It’s for a beginner which is fair enough but it doesn’t increase an edge of pro player.
Every VB defines particular ball rotation and reads reference number.
(Even VB2, with an exception that it we can read it in different rotation, but it sdtil relates to particular ball rotation. )
What did Jafco bring new?
Nothing, his solution is; watch and estimate when the ball speed is somewhere in between 3.25 to 4 rotations. He even explained it wrongly believing it will work only if you use first diamond, which of course isn’t truth.
If that’s the system he sells, and it is, how can he call it expert system in any way?
What is new?
Perhaps baptising "diamond " to a “pin” is new. Same as you, instead of switch you want it to be a button.
“My roulette playing method has produced a long term winning margin for more than two decades. The experience gained over this time has enabled me to update frequently, probably creating the most practical and modern winning Visual Roulette System available anywhere.”
This is false advertising or something wrong with him.
Jafco does not sell "systems" that is what stefano does, and we all know stefano has 3 lifetimes before he can even think to be on jafcos level.
That’s not truth, regardless my problems with Stefano and knowledge that he really never played VB. I do not see why he can’t teach it. I honestly do not see any difference in between VB they documented.
Both claim to be experts but when I get system they have, I see nothing more then basic.
Listen forrester, i am a man of peace and prosperity so i will not argue. However, Its some of jafcos customers that does not wan't casinos to know about pred7 not jafco. That COULD be the reason for his low profile, that is all i was trying to say (i should have said that more clearly). Rumor has it one of his customers want to pay him to stop selling pred7 to the public.
Maybe, it happened to me, I even stopped selling it for one year. But anybody can claim it, especially someone who wants advertising as he does. What I am saying is that I am not impressed with Jafco’s VB or videos at all.
In regards to him using google adds, so what!!!. How can people buy something if its not advertised. I would have never bought laurence scott's book if it was not advertised because I would have never known about it (even though i bought it on ebay sorry scott) .
Well VB professionals I was telling you about didn’t have to advertise how they won in Ritz 500k. They also never wrote that anybody paid them to not do it. I do not believe any of them will invite you to their place so they can teach you VB for $300. I wouldnt do it.
Jafco walks the walk and he really plays from time to time he has nothing to prove. How can people say his videos are bogus when people use his video spins to show off their vb skills and systems on the internet and still get the numbers wrong (ON A VIDEO REPLAY).
First of all conditions he demonstrate on video are extreamly artificial.
Every single wheel he showed has huge ball deceleration.
Once I checked it was 330 ms difference in between two ball rotations.
Do you know what does it mean?
You can confidently have plus or minus 100ms error and still have same prediction.
You can repeat and you will again and again get same prediction. God bless, It is tilted wheel prediction where only ball rotation is identified. According to his short videos even his prediction is so late and on such wheel he still has mistaken in prediction.
Even he got nice hit because the ball jumped much longer it doesn’t sound right. It also indicates that his spins on his video are carefully selected.
In my life I only experienced with Stefano and Jafco that final ball stop (after ball bouncing) is more accurate then point when the ball will drop on rotor. In usual after ball scatter distribution across rotor pockets it is at least 50% worst.
