Just a quick look back to E2 method of predicting roulette levelled wheel.
E2 is where it all started, it is the only one roulette visual system that can predict levelled roulette wheel. It is the system I discovered and used for years when my knowledge was limited and I wasn’t aware of tilted wheels.
It is a bit complicated to apply but it includes and rotor adjustment for smaller rotor speed changes.
It takes only 4-5s to apply it. It requires spins at least 12-15 seconds long or longer.
With all respect to traditional VB, or myrulet VB2 predictions on wheels with dominant ball drop point (tilted wheel) E2 system might be something we should analyse more.
So how come after so many years I am writing about it?
Of course in each casino it may be different but what I have noticed is that simply is harder to find roulette tilted wheels with enough tilt for a good visual prediction. With only slight tilt advantage players “luck” is hanging in the air.
Think about this. If you walk to casino and have few hours to play what is the highest chance that you will play levelled or tilted wheel? Is slight tilt better to predict as tilt or levelled wheel?
If you have enough knowledge and experience playing slight tiled wheel you would be aware that often even if you predict correctly ball drop point ball jumps may be against you. Of course Jumps are always against you but often you would experience correct prediction but the ball jumps differently, and wrong prediction the ball jumps correctly. I am not going to explain reasons because we analysed it many times. The point I want to say here is that E2 because of linear increase in prediction based on ball speed is more resistant to such negative effect.
Traditional VB is predicting particular ball rotation and diamond hit, E2 is predicting ball drop point.
Traditional VB may predict 0 the ball may hit dominant diamond at any position and jump differently, also #0 may be in different position.
E2 may predict 0 the ball may hit diamond even 10-15 pockets earlier but in such case most likely it will hit top of the diamond where the ball may fly longer until hits the rotor also in average jumps longer.
Some E2 bad points. It is less accurate. It is harder for player to notice where the advantage is. If using it need to observe partly ball drops which often may not be as expected but and final results. Combination of both is the only indicator that the player is doing right thing.
Let’s round it up
No roulette computer, no timer, no idea if there is any tilted wheel, wide scatter, few hours of time and idea let’s try E2. With no timer I meant a timer as FF has where the time can be started at any moment. However good side of E2 is that it can use mobile phones vibrating metronome because the time can be started at any ball position. I remember E2 needs time of about 4-5s. (not on all wheels !!!) So I set vibration to ~50 bits per minute. When counting from first vibration 5 it would give me 4.8s. Because spins were similar I could start time counting after 2-3 vibrations from moment the dealer spins.
Using “reference number” as a prediction placing small bets was actually made me lost ~60 units. As I already pointed out with E2 is a bit hard to define where the advantage is. It looked more it is on opposite side. Instead of changing prediction I modified time to 45b/m (~5.3s). It doesn’t matter much that I disturbed reference time since anyway I didn’t know want is the best time to use and my start point was in similar moments. That drastically changed things, later on I also shifted prediction to about 6 pockets earlier as a fine tune. In remaining 2-3 hours recover loss and gained 200 units. Say 100 spins x ~10 units is 1000 units. That makes 26% advantage.
Of course on only 100 spins it could be just a coincidence but I really enjoyed playing it even I noticed that I am missing a lot skill as I use to have when playing it more than 15 years ago.
I believe we should look deeper in to E2. Define way how to more precisely set the time and who knows what else together we can find. Instead using FF to look data and define needed time it wouldn’t be hard with a metronome. For example vibration;
1 -0
2- x
3- 23
4-x
5-15
6-x
7-y >>5
At first number 0 is starting number
On 5th it is 15 which is 2 pockets away.
But if we noticed number 19 on third vibration it means on 7th it needs to be 2 pockets away from #23. If instead of #5 it is 24,16,33… or 10,23,8,30 it has meaning to extend or reduce the time.
A quick reminder how myrulet E2 predicts
Point A #4 is first number, point B #17 is second one. Apply from A, 3 times that difference. In such case it is 4 pockets but we don’t count pockets. Instead we apply the angle. So it comes to point 2 , then 3 and number 8 would be the reference number for prediction.
If point B is in position as b1 it is a large angle. We don’t apply such large but use some geometrical laws. Instead of number 4 use opposite number (1-33) and apply same principle. (it makes it much easier). It brings us to number 31 as a reference for prediction.
. You think these firsts say something to these others? 