[quote=“uchimata, post:60, topic:239”]That would seem to be parent of one opposite louburache, or a opposite fivonachi, that’s dont work.
A lot of people in the history try to make a lot of ways to bet roulette, mathematical way is not the key.
All the people that play “PROFECIONAL” know the decrease or progresionate the bet, or the bank roll, ““don’t work in long term””,
Still more playing odds, no one win in long term playing odds, if some one wins in long term playing odds, i can see that.
The money management is not the key to win roulette, flat bets every time , and stay in the top of the peack is the key, find the best pattern to play, the money is secundary.
Uchi, we have math edge because we have tracked the wheel and know our numbers all together win 5% to the total wagwed(1/36).
We can win playing mathemetically as the bank does every time.
The bank has the 2.7% and waits, the more bet the more the bank win just because it has the mathematical edge.
We are at the same shoe as the bank is, the counterpart is that we do not have its bankroll.
So, we must decide to invest a bankroll, that is to say 10k and manage to survive the dispersion until math does what we studied it would do.