First video proof for Acrobat FF4


#1

Hello dear Community!

Today I was able to find some time to make a video win proof of Acrobat FF4.
There are 39 spins shown in the footage.

As soon as possible I will upload this video to my Youtube channel and let you know.

Notice:
Applied revision: FFZ4_Acrobat_4_R17.production_6
Link to the revision file: https://rouletteplace.com/t/ff4-acrobat-4/1175/1813 - and scroll down a bit.


#2

It says I don’t have access to that link. How do I gain access please?


#3

Please ask Forester over pm, I have no idea, sorry.


#4

Can you post the video on YT?


#5

Yeah please post it on youtube would be great :slight_smile:


#6

Don’t panic, I will! :ok_hand:


#7

Okay, the footage is finally done. Now it’s time for rendering. This procession takes a lot of time. Then after it will be uploaded to my YT channel. Later on I will post here a link and a description to this video.
All those who has subscribed to my channel will be let know.

I hope you like this video!


#8

!!! The video is uploaded !!!

Have fun!
If you have some questions, feel free and ask me.


#9

Hard to see because of very large scatter of ball jumps.

Would you have profit if pockets were covered?


#10

Great video Donna.

Are you predicting the ball drop/fall off point or landing? As far I know the FF predicts where the ball falls off the track.

What do you think about the predictions? Could be human error or clocking error.


#11

Yes, I always bet 3 numbers, the total profit was 99 units or $ or €.


#12

The predictions are the final number - not the drop point.
Drop point doesn’t make a sense to me, because of simplicity. I only add feedback to FF, where the ball has landed (final number).

Predictions which were wrong depend on the ball jumps behavior (rotor speed is a common factor for).


#13

Ok, if you will bet in opposite side 5 numbers - you will be in plus165. But anyway if to build chart from all hits as distances from predicted number - is absolute chaos, what not talk at all about advantage… plus predictions was made really quite late 3-4 rotations till end not real to place bets in real casino…
Ok , but all that talk, that wheel is maybe not easy and what is main - you not played , only betted what you says program. You must work with program , do adjustments corecttions and so on.
Simpliest what you could do - notice that opposite side is much better… or you done something like corrections shifting Dd and similar ?


#14

In which way you added ? Similar that added in circular way, that is not good, when so long scatering…


#15

After prediction I try to get the Rzap for the last rotation. When the ball has landed within a pocket (the RC is waiting for me to enter corrections) I press the button for amount of pckets divided by 3 and add from predicted number to the final number. Ball jumps will be skipped.

Yes, this wheel is very crappy!
Why do you think I do not think while playing? Of course, the main thing of a RC is to make the things easier!!! There is no doubt at all.
As you can see I add corrections, what the hell are you talking about?


#16

From video is very hard to notice what you do, but then is even worse… that talks that corrections not helped and created two picks in opposite sides , what is always when predict one DD but ball with the same proportion hit to next or to previous DD


#17

By the way, if you point final point in circular way like you done is better not do any correcttions for sample…


#18

Why DD?
What is DD for you?
For me it means Dominant Diamond!


#19

and your explanation!?


#20

No matter what you get in final - program still firstly predict place where ball will drop then add offset.
DD can be understand as dominant diamond or drop diamond so that you must understand from contect.