Arturas, it is hard to explain E2 so I made a small video, I hope it helps to understand.
There are explanations somewhere in members section from two years ago.
But I did not use E2 for long time.
Sure that based on when we start within targeted 4-5 sec, prediction may change by few pockets and also our observation and multiplication can add some more errors.
But it still reasonably predicts.
It is similar to what you use but with meaning what each pocket difference in observation represents.
Also since observation is from rotor numbers it almost fully includes rotor speed changes.
Experiment and analyzing video recordings.
Even if time is not so accurate it doesn’t matter much as long as you have good feeling to start time at close to same time.
On similar principles my VB2 for tilted wheel is based. Of course it is much simpler.
What is the change in reference time is 1/3 of what is the change of real ball position.
With VB2 it is 1/1, also the change is much smaller.
I think i understand but just to be clear, if i go to the casino tonight and try e2, would i simply pick a time and try it out then make adjustments as neccesary or is there some way of finding a starting time?
'Even if time is not so accurate it doesn’t matter much as long as you have good feeling to start time at close to same time. ’
same time as what?
Also, i tried the link to your vb2 system found in this forum but link was dead…can you help please?
As on video I did predict from from 3 sec to 8 sec with good linearity that is 5 sec time for player to start system during the spin and still to have systems linearity.
If I was using 5 sec instead of 4.2 then that time may be only 3 sec, and prediction slightly starts shifting.
If we convert 5 sec to ball rotations it may be let’s say 8 ball rotations.
The main point is to learn to get feeling for ball speed, within 3-4 rotations.
Then it really doesn’t matter much if the time is 4 or 5 sec.
Yes we lost the link, I found some files you can download it here:
Hey thanks, you’re a good man. But I was refering to the VB2 link.
nice show tho ;D
Do you sell the timers for e2 or should i find one myself?
It seems to me that with a deal of practice, e2 can be used without a timer(removing the need to take a device into a casino). What are your opinions about the practicality of this?
Do you know where I can find some spins videos so I can prctice e2 Please?
Do you sell the timers for e2 or should i find one myself?
FFZ has adjustable timer. But you can use any, good is metronome watch.
It seems to me that with a deal of practice, e2 can be used without a timer(removing the need to take a device into a casino). What are your opinions about the practicality of this?
Theoretically yes. But you can't have such good count of time.
Do not forget that every mistake is 3 times larger.
VB2 is ok without timer.
Do you know where I can find some spins videos so I can prctice e2 Please?
Check genuine winner site he published some videos to promote his product.
Took it to work and opened it there and converted it to something i can see ;D Many thanks
Yes I do have a day job…something I’m looking to remedy in the near future
V2 just looks too simple to work :o Can it really be that easy??
So, if I can do the ground work first, then learn V2 and E2 inside out, should I be able to make enough money to live on comfortably? What are your thoughts on making a living at roulette?
Personally, if I can make £2.5k and never play again, I’d be a happy man.
Presumably, when choosing a timing device, I should choose one which has an adjustable output?
V2 just looks too simple to work Can it really be that easy??
And what is traditional VB? Identify when ball is at particular speed read reference number, compare it to outcome. Simple.
VB2 is simpler because with traditional VB if you miss to identify when the ball is at right speed you are far out from result. With VB2 you are not. You can be wrong 5 rotations and still get same reference number. It is smart system and very easy to apply. It is so smart that many couldn’t understand that it can be so simple.
Any Average Joe can say I know VB, I look and estimate when the ball is at particular speed. For that Joe there is a problem if he doesn’t estimate it right, he knows it but doesn’t know better then that. Because he is an Average Joe and I am not, I am an “Average” Engineer, when I see problem I find solution. Some Joe’s can’t even understand when solution gets introduced to them, therefore we can’t blame Av. Joe if he couldn’t find his own solution.
[b]I found out that most people can’t understand how VB2 can work if we do not read first number but only number after reference time is elapsed. We do not need it because starting point is constant, ball drop point is constant, time of starting reference time for VB2 is not constant (since we do not know did we start in same ball rotation), but also the ball traveling distance in reference time is not constant (faster ball in same time crosses more pockets).
Adjusting reference time where the ball traveling distance in pockets changes from point to point matches distance in pockets that rotor would travel from point to point gives us the prefect prediction regardless in which point we predict. Changes are reverse proportional, canceling errors caused by using different starting point in time therefore we still have accurate prediction. All we need for VB2 is particular reference time to apply at some stage during the spin. [/b]
So, if I can do the ground work first, then learn V2 and E2 inside out, should I be able to make enough money to live on comfortably? What are your thoughts on making a living at roulette?
VB2 is much easier then E2, but E2 is the one ever solution for visual kind of prediction on leveled wheel. Few years ago I supplied timer and E2 to one guy at GG forum for testing on his wheel. During ~500 spins he did have 1:28 hit rate.
All he did play spins, write start number and second number. Then I explained how multiplication by 3 provides as reasonable result. That is how myrulet.com site come up.
I was asked to make FF and together with 10 people we started project.
I didn’t play E2 for years, and I am not sure if I would be able to create advantage as I use to do it, it requires a lot of practice and wheels are getting harder. I do not know can you make living with VB2 or E2 or any traditional VB. What do you think?
Presumably, when choosing a timing device, I should choose one which has an adjustable output?
Yes, but also in may situations it may be important to have time starting at particular moment. So it would be good if timer can be started by switch.
Everything is ok except you can count only theoretically.
You need a timer.
For example, if you counting 4 instead of 4.2s you are wrong by 0.2 sec.
In that time the ball may cross 20 pockets …x 3 is 60 , far more then 37.
In example “So 2 becomes my target and I play 2 and neighbors.”
" 2" would be only reference number from which the ball should drop with constant distance.
For example you may get predicted 2 and the ball drops at 20,
But next spin if you get predicted 0 the ball should drop around 5.
From that approach reference time can be reduced, 1.5-2 sec no multiplication and you are playing tilt2. Much easier.
Example:
"I have started counting after the ball crosses zero.
On 4 seconds I get number 15
So now from 0 to 15 is 2 pockets, So now we go from 15 another 4 pockets to the number 2.
So 2 becomes my target and I play 2 and neighbors.
Is this in anyway close to the correct method of playing E2?"
Forrester, I would like to ask something because im a little bit confused.In the video demonstration, the arc betwen zero and the number under the ball after 4.2 sec is measured from zero to that number ( in trigonometrical sense) and the multiplication is also added to the number located under the ball after 4.2 sec, again in triginometrical sense , but in his example, toxic sad otherwise and you said to him that its ok.Also I would like to ask you if there is any change of finding a link somewhere with the original material of E2 system, because it can be find on the forum, i`ve looked everywhere.Thanks
: