Why no one speaks about what has importance?


#1

Why no one speaks about what is important??
Everyone speaks about methods…
No one speaks roulette!!! What is going on in this " little roulette world"?
What should be player focused on, l wonder…
Why everyone here tolking methods? Identify revolution or ball time… does it matter? How to do it… ets.
And it’s everywhere!!! Any forum one may go, any book one take… all the same!. Resycle of same shit with different flavours.
Why no one speaks errors , dispersion, distrebutions, consystency, proper data taking , forming and verification of hypoteses, adjustment… ets. ? No one has anything to say? Comments?


#2

[quote=“Sith”]
Why no one speaks about what is important??
Everyone speaks about methods…
No one speaks roulette!!! What is going on in this " little roulette world"?
What should be player focused on, l wonder…
Why everyone here tolking methods? Identify revolution or ball time… does it matter? How to do it… ets.
And it’s everywhere!!! Any forum one may go, any book one take… all the same!. Resycle of same shit with different flavours.
Why no one speaks errors , dispersion, distrebutions, consystency, proper data taking , forming and verification of hypoteses, adjustment… ets. ? No one has anything to say? Comments?
[/quote]

Sergiy, it is not important to tell others how to analyse. You only need to know what to do yourself, as you know the RC is only to record certain metrics in a consistent manner, how you measure then use those metrics will often divide the good player from an “ok” player. Your approach seems to have changed since the early days, it seems you are taking data more seriously which can only be a good thing imo.


#3

[quote=“devilish”]
[quote=“Sith”]
Why no one speaks about what is important??
Everyone speaks about methods…
No one speaks roulette!!! What is going on in this " little roulette world"?
What should be player focused on, l wonder…
Why everyone here tolking methods? Identify revolution or ball time… does it matter? How to do it… ets.
And it’s everywhere!!! Any forum one may go, any book one take… all the same!. Resycle of same shit with different flavours.
Why no one speaks errors , dispersion, distrebutions, consystency, proper data taking , forming and verification of hypoteses, adjustment… ets. ? No one has anything to say? Comments?
[/quote]

Sergiy, it is not important to tell others how to analyse. You only need to know what to do yourself, as you know the RC is only to record certain metrics in a consistent manner, how you measure then use those metrics will often divide the good player from an “ok” player. Your approach seems to have changed since the early days, it seems you are taking data more seriously which can only be a good thing imo.
[/quote] Then how you want them to come up with something useful? You say rc is to record… record what??? What rc records now, in a minute is just waste of ink. And what is good to keep, rc do not record.


#4

[quote=“Sith”]
[quote=“devilish”]
[quote=“Sith”]
Why no one speaks about what is important??
Everyone speaks about methods…
No one speaks roulette!!! What is going on in this " little roulette world"?
What should be player focused on, l wonder…
Why everyone here tolking methods? Identify revolution or ball time… does it matter? How to do it… ets.
And it’s everywhere!!! Any forum one may go, any book one take… all the same!. Resycle of same shit with different flavours.
Why no one speaks errors , dispersion, distrebutions, consystency, proper data taking , forming and verification of hypoteses, adjustment… ets. ? No one has anything to say? Comments?
[/quote]

Sergiy, it is not important to tell others how to analyse. You only need to know what to do yourself, as you know the RC is only to record certain metrics in a consistent manner, how you measure then use those metrics will often divide the good player from an “ok” player. Your approach seems to have changed since the early days, it seems you are taking data more seriously which can only be a good thing imo.
[/quote]
Then how you want them to come up with something useful? You say rc is to record… record what??? What rc records now, in a minute is just waste of ink. And what is good to keep, rc do not record.

[/quote]

Nice to see you still have the same attitude that got you banned, I am sure folks here will learn loads with such posts!

Data analysis is mathematics, you do not need a forum to learn these things, just the desire. If you can achieve good metrics and apply them, you win, if not…? I do not refer exclusively to RC use as a way of measure.

Of course, if you want to show everyone what you know and think they should learn, you do not need a forum it seems, the back of a small stamp, quill and ink pot should be adequate. Just post a pic of it :-).


#5

Showing anyone anything proves to be simply waste of time. I made life demo on Skype for 15 people already. Explained step by step what lm doing and why in each moment… Do you know how many came back after demo? …1… only. Others couldn’t be bothered to learn anything.
For some reason people do not want to think themselves.
They think RC, or god, or fortuna gonna be on their side… all they need to do is to click…click…click and stupid microcontroller with tiny memory will perform better then their (most suffisticated in the nature ) brain. They do not even know or able to see from other peoples videos WHERE they supposed to make that click.
It’s like Google, everyone uses but none understand, and it’s just enough to type on the search box " how to use google".
I’m still however curios, why no one tolks what matters? Protecting info from casinos? They already know this shit… at least some of it. They teach dealers to use it. So what is a point?