I received this from one of Stefano’s player who is completely lost and desperate to get his money-back.
The pattern he claims Casino does not detect, what a joke, it needs the wheel to be biased to some degree for this pattern to develop, another bullshit written in his ebook:
You simply track the wheel per directions, clockwise and anticlockwise, and you calculate the pockets distance between the last number spun clockwise, and the following number spun clockwise. On another chart, the distance between the last number spun anti-clockwise and the following number spun anti-clockwise.
I will give you the result of 1,000 real spins clockwise, and another 1,000 real spins anti-clockwise from the same wheel:
Chart for clockwise ball direction:
You can see the peak at around +13, but this is due to a sector bias present on this wheel, when the ball is spun clockwise (number 13 sector).
Stefano wants to sell that to Casinos? lol what a joke, this is very known.
Has stefanos dealers signature no release point build in ?
Wether its a bias or not is hard to say when all we got is the numbers. It could be random but it could also be a bias in development. I have seen developments like that on a wheel in Hohensyburg that turned out to be random.
PS: I think you need to change the Las Vegas label on the excel.
Why would someone analyze bias from point where the ball dropped last?
Why not from point when it starts spinning or even better from VB defined point?
It doesnt makes sense, i will take a stance when i know what triggers a pattern. Obviously just chasing number sequnzes will be pure guess work. Bago says one thing stefano something else. No one quotes any rules from the e books so i dont feel much wiser than i did this morning.
Back to the stock market i got some shorts to cover before close.
[quote=“Forester, post:3, topic:275”]Why would someone analyze bias from point where the ball dropped last?
Why not from point when it starts spinning or even better from VB defined point?[/quote]
Hello Forester, you are saying something true, at simple view, taking the start point or a vb method to analize bias, but remeber the peaks change to generate a random chart, some day you have the best peak in +13 but the other day you have the best peak at -3, folowing the same prosedure to colect spins,that’s the interesting part of roullete, the random that generats in long term, what do you think about that?
I do not play bias numbers.
Apparently some people do combine VB with bias.
For me bias is when some pockets are coming more often then the others.
Some day you have the best peak in +13 but the other day you have the best peak at -3, following the same procedure to collect spins
The question for any method of prediction is how accurate it is. Maybe procedure of collecting spins is not accurate. That is one of the reasons why genuine winner system can’t work. To detect one pick point takes time especially because it is based on average of averages and advantage is only small, until you collect enough data it changes and you can’t know if it changed.
With FF I always know how accurate I am because I always can see if the ball is hitting where is expected to hit. Same with VB.
I do not disrespect people who collect few thousands spin and play bias. Simply it is not my way of play.
[quote=“myrulet, post:6, topic:275”]I do not play bias numbers.
Apparently some people do combine VB with bias.
For me bias is when some pockets are coming more often then the others.
Some day you have the best peak in +13 but the other day you have the best peak at -3, following the same procedure to collect spins
The question for any method of prediction is how accurate it is. Maybe procedure of collecting spins is not accurate. That is one of the reasons why genuine winner system can’t work. To detect one pick point takes time especially because it is based on average of averages and advantage is only small, until you collect enough data it changes and you can’t know if it changed.
With FF I always know how accurate I am because I always can see if the ball is hitting where is expected to hit. Same with VB.
I do not disrespect people who collect few thousands spin and play bias. Simply it is not my way of play.[/quote]
Maby i can’t explane as well,(sorry about my inglish) that i talking about aniway you play visual balistic,(visual bailistic is a kind of apreciation that people takes to make a playing chart) one day the best peak is in +3 and the other is in -13, that generate a bias, not the kind of josheph jagers biased wheal, the kind of visual balistic,or for example,Did you colect spins monday whith visaul balistic ,and see the peaks emerge in +3 then you come to the casino tuesday and don’t qulify and play +3 again?
Do you calibrate every day?
Do you calibrate in every spin or amount of spins?
If you do, why you qualify every amount of spins?
some people said is barometical presure, other said is umedity or cold or the enviroment.
Do you belive in this?
Or maby is the random law? that nivelates everithing in the long term?
knowin the roullete was not moved
and knowin, the nivelation of the wheal is the same, at the same diamond, do you calibrate every day?
if your patterns don’t change it convert in a kind of visual balistic bias. if your patterns change is because the random of the machine is afecting, what do you think about this fenomenum?
