Last year I refused to sell any of my systems. I simply referred all potential buyers to Mark Howe and Stefano. I never recommend or discredit any of them and it was buyer’s choice to select whatever they prefer or believe.
In many occasions I did get negative feedback about them, but it was not reliable information. Anybody could claim to have their computer and write how it isn’t good.
Mine main objective is not to be system seller I am a player, therefore I have no reason to discredit anybody. For me the best is to be neutral. But is it really neutral if you know something is not as it was claimed to be, and if someone may lose much money because of that and you do nothing about it. I do not think so.
Therefore I decided to open my mouth. It does not cost me anything and it may help someone. My loss can be only bad writing about me from someone who does not like my review, however I can leave with that and general opinion does not affects me at all. Additional reason of this post is to avoid replaying on all emails that people ask me about other roulette computers.
Recently Stefano sent emails with proposal to promote his system/computer and if you sell one he will pay you 50% of price. Another way of promotion. There are so many desperate gamblers that would do anything to make some money.
Stefano’s computer has been tested from 3 independent testers. In recent exchange of few posts with Kelly at GG forum, I was accused from Bago that I do not have Stefano’s computer.
You can read it here.
http://www.gamblersglen.com/cgi-bin/teemz/teemz.cgi?board=_master&action=opentopic&topic=149&forum=Gambling_Tools
Because he first accuse me of lying then asked me for prove, I did not want to answer his question. Instead I challenged him with $500 as a donation for GG forum if I answer question or if I do not I will donate $1000. Of course after some jumping and empty words Bago run away. Stefao manipulated him.
Well I will answer his question here.
Stefano’s computer is activated in applications with 4 digit code (it can be changed) and it is entered as playing game tic tack toe. It starts as a kid’s game and that is how it works. If you thinking to buy it consider that you must after every 20 hours of play send 14 letters code to Stefano and receive 12 letters code to enter it in computer. That way he can refuse any time to send you new code under excuse that you talked about his phone or that you used it in casino. Other words you have no chance to get any money back.
As excuse Stefano blames his customers that they are not doing accurate clocking.
My question is; isn’t the computer one who should do error corrections.
Whoever uses his computer would know that he would hear more RISK then anything else. It is extremely difficult to use in reality, it’s quite clear to me that he’s never had to use this computer in a real casino situation himself, it requires the exact information from the wheel you are playing. That is what he would say is needed. But that is not the only one problem with his computer.
The real problem is that computer does not have prediction at all. Next step in testing was on his video spins with data that he provided that is specific for his wheel. We did few tests and result is really disappointing.
Simple test as repeating single spin and try to predict it 40 times gave us random results.
How it can be if computer has any prediction. Single spin has only one final result, and if we repeat that spin computer should predict it all the time same. My latest system without all those settings that he requires just after few spins needed for automatic adjustment for particular wheel would have accuracy of close to 1 number in prediction, (based on detected ball and rotor speed).
Recently I received phone call from guy close related to Ritz team. For me he is the one who really understands the game and who helped me to develop system to next level based on his needs. In middle conversation he starts telling me how he had hands on Stefano’s computer, he calls Stefano Greek guy. Well his way of testing produced same results as mine. No prediction at all.
On top of that he made comment that it is it is nicely done with many options but only problem is that it does not work.
This would be enough, I think after this there is no need to describe his paper system which I also have. Of course I never played it and supply numbers to Stefano but I do have here people who did it. If for any reason Stefano is not happy with my review and thinks that it is unjustified, that is fine with me. I am prepared to visit him with few of his computers for money refund. At one stage he advertises that he will refund double money. That would not be necessary, original purchase price will be enough.
If you are reader of this post and if you have his computer you are welcome to provide your opinion. You can also perform basic test as described at http://myrulet.com/four-diamonds-roulette-computer-test.html