Regarding VLS discussion.
Stefano sent tilted wheel spins to Ronjo, all ball hits are on one side of wheel. And 2 main dominant diamonds at 12 and 9 o’clock , it is his own saying.
Then claims from 100 spins he got 15 well predicted.
Every a basic computer for tilted wheel with such narrow limits will do it.
That diamond probably got 40% of hits and he predicted only 15.
If 15% spins were predicted it means that time limit where he got ball is very narrow only 15% of full ball rotation width, approximately 25 ms. As to catch the ball with time per rotation in between 1000-1025 ms.
It also means that he doesn’t predict in any rotation and he just managed to make computer as Michael Barnett did 10 years ago. :-\
I asked few questions but none of them were answered. Instead Stefano start talking about court case.
So i just gave up and do not want to be involved.
basic 4 diamond test, is enough for FFZ.
But for computers which talk such as FFA and his computer is not.
It was enough for Stefano’s computer earlier because it couldn’t pass even that.
However basic tilted wheel computer which does audio (needs to know rotor position to be able to call number) will pass it.
Of course for that Ronjo had to change limits since you cant do single spin where you limit computer to only 15% because at the other diamond is different ball speed most likely ~40 ms different.
Imagine rotation is 1000 to 1200 ms and limits were set that way.
We use tilted wheel approach where we clocking ball rotations until we get ball within those limits.
DIAMOND 1)
We clock rotor at 12 o’clock. Rotor moves (computer has to calculate movement). At moment when we get ball speed rotor moved lets say 1 rotation. So system predicts lets say zero.
If we move same test to 3 o’clock diamond. We do same, clock rotor, rotor moves, this time we going to get right rotation 1/4 of rotation later. For that time rotor moves only few pockets and system still predicts ~same number.
And so on… with remaining diamonds.
To differentiate if the computer, works as tilted or leveled wheel we need to do a bit more of testing.
After DIAMOND 1 test we still clock rotor at 12 o’lock then we clock ball at 6 o’clock, the system has to predict opposite result. If computer predicts same or close to same (by change how much rotor moves during ½ rotation) the computer works with tilted wheel algorithms.
Computer needs to predict opposite because rotor is clocked at same position, but we know that entered ball speed to computer is by ½ rotations different. So if computer is designed for leveled wheel and accurate it must detect change in ball speed it needs to predict differently. (Only the FF has such accuracy ;D)
In addition since Stefano claims that his computer calculates function, it should do this test with same results in any rotation we predict (4, 5, and 6,7,8,9 … rotations before then ball drops). If it can’t do it then all his previous talk is bullshit. And he just discovered how to create basic program for tilted wheel.
Also testing in different ball rotations should be done even if computer works on tilted wheel principles.
FFA with IQE6 algorithms is the only one computer designed to work on wheels without any dominant drop point.
It all goes back to time when Mark and Stefano were arguing who has bigger head.
Actually none of them did it properly, simply because hey couldn’t since they do not have right hardware.
At least Mark did understand my test from the start, but Stefano still has a problem understanding it.
Stefano is so proud with 15 predicted spins on tilted wheel. (but he talks non sense in usual)
Of course he may increase limits and still got something. But FF predicts very accurately 75% of spins.
On such wheel and good visual player will achieve better results. Look Jefco and his video. So what is the point of using such computer and test if nothing more is explained and when the test is on a wheel with dominant drop point?
Maybe to entertain yourself, spend 5 hours in casino to get predicted 15 spins, you wouldn’t lose much money.
Question someone may ask could be, but can such computer based on tilted wheel calculation predict and leveled wheel?
Yes it can, it its set on very tight limits, as you can see Stefano got it only to 15% where the wheel has strong tilt.
If computer is accurate enough with good timing features and calculation, on such wheel it should get at least 50%.
It is obvious than that he had to narrow limits because of imperfections in timing.
He can’t in same time claim it is dominant diamond and that it gets only 15% of hits. It is obvious that the diamond did get more hits. Even with normal distribution as on leveled wheel vertical diamonds get 20% of hits each.
If the wheel is 100% leveled, computer for tilted wheel prediction with limits of 10% theoretically may still produce some advantage. It means to get 10 spins out of 100 predicted.
Another strange thing is that he eve did not show video on which the test was performed.
We all know that he loved to show it until videos got analyzed by people who understand.
From all description Ronjo did not do 4D test, he even is not competent to notice that he didn’t do it since he has no clue about my test, instead he only did what Stefano told him to do.
Guys this is for you to understand, I do not want to be involved with any discussion with frustrated man.
He is so unreasonable, blaming me for everything that his customers did to him.
Who is long enough here would also know that Stefano is one who was stalking me and my family, and who supplied my full name to casinos and to public.
Just look what he wrote.
"He has no reason to be concerned about a court order. He is not fighting for something like custody of a child. He is fighting for the ability to publish private information about me, and why? Is there any reason for that other than trying to upset me? He doesnt want to publish things directly anymore, like photos of ironing boards, so he gets bago to do that and thinks it's acceptable. He has threatened me for protecting my privacy, saying I am disrupting his site. Well gee sorry forester, have a think about it. Bago and mark are being dealt with by the police in time, but you are a different matter. We agreed reviews would be accepted (because it wouldnt matter with things like ranjo's report and the webcam demo), but all private information removed, but there you are again allowing the very link you said to the judge you only permitted because you didn't know what was there.. also forester, I dont mean to inconvenience you by bringing you to melbourne again, but again I wont accept what you are doing. Would you?"
It think this guy is on the edge of madness.
Nobody gives shit about him so he is repeating and repeating same.
"He doesnt want to publish things directly anymore, like photos of ironing boards, so he gets bago to do that and thinks it's acceptable."
I even never published photo, Bago did and he still does. So how can I make Bago to do what he already done 3 months ago and is still there? Anyway what is not the big issue except that it shows that he doesn’t live in multimillionaire dollar house as he claimed?
"you said to the judge you only permitted because you didn't know what was there.."
He is writing on his forum directly to me even knowing that i am not a member over there.
Anyway it isn’t the truth, I said to judge that link was there because of graph, and genuine public discussion.
Later on pictures were added and Bago removed faces from pictures. I said to judge it is nothing to do with me, but with relationship with Mr. GW and his customers.
Then i shout at him “so why am am here Mr. GW”
And he shut up. 
He is only a hero when he talks to himself.
