Well as a customer of Howe’s, then yes I must be biased! He does not massage his own ego with a forum. At Howe’s site he is beating a level wheel with his Psion, yet forester claims it does not work and possibly a few others. The saying “a poor man blames his tools”.
The video and my own findings backs Howe’s claims. It works very differently to foresters devices. The reason that the same number appears in the 4 diamond test for example is simply because you have not sent the Psion computer up correctly which I find amusing. Which device of Foresters beats a level wheel? None I presume. If you were to Ask Barnett who Maxim is and what device did he use, he would tell you Howe’s Psion device. He even gave a helping hand to develop it .To claim it does not work on this site is for commercial gain towards Forester and nothing else. He saw endless people who posted on GamblersGlen that his device worked and they purchased it, how many sellers genuinely see people in person? I saw at least 20 genuine positive reviews of his device at GamblersGlen.
Back to scatter for Devilish. Yes you are correct to a point, do all wheels fall between -2 and +12, no, but most Huxley’s wheels do. You see Devilish, its a simple analysis to prove the effectiveness of any device. for example, lets record the strike point and where the ball finishes up in his videos right now at his site. Will find that the distribution on two very different wheels falls between -2 and +12, check it yourself. Howe also had an old Huxleys Wheel from Monte Carlo, guess what Devilish, again -2 to +12, I have his old disks he supplied with the original computer I purchased and I have done much studying.This wheel has 14 diamonds, deep brass pockets and a V profile where the ball rotates and decelerates quickly. You see Devilsh, that Howe is actually accurate and so am I , I have played for over 20 years myself. The Evidence is there. I remember recording my own results when I first got the Psion, again -2 to +12. Howe showed me even how the device corrects for various rotor speeds. But what he told me that day was something that had eluded me for years and why others cannot predict Level wheels. As you know, Howe is the only one that can do this and provides evidence. I have 100’s of recordings on graph paper from different casinos, different balls, various wheels, majority Huxleys. The results are nearly always around this area.The only wheels that produced different results were One Pocket RING cut by computers, then the scatter is shifted and widened. As for the JAFCO wheel video, that guy is verging on Trickery the same as Stefano. For a site that has members claiming to be top experts, I would disagree, I have done the time and have the results. What will puzzle you all here, is, how come a tilted wheel and a level wheel scatter is very similar for over a 100 spins? Howe and Maxim used something else. Weird how that Funny Old Psion that people are here claim does not work, kicks ace on a level wheel and tilted wheels? If you do not understand how to use the Psion Forester then you should ask Howe to help you, but claiming it does not work undermines your integrity and reveals your motives.
The best news is that roulette computers - I can’t tell you that news yet, as devastating as it is to you all.
When I see a man like Howe create such brilliant roulette computers to be knocked by people with little understanding of the game, it annoys me, jealousy springs to mind. He makes his own hearing aids, created the first single switch system and was the first to beat LEVEL wheels over 25 years ago. For me its a simple logical deduction, someone that allows 10% deposit until the customer is ultimately happy is genuine. Howe offers that piece of mind
I am fortunate that I live very near Howe in Derbyshire on the outskirts of Sheffield, when he’s in the UK of course and he has spent endless free hours demonstrating How to beat roulette, also dealer signature and visual ballistics.
Oh and Devilish, Youtube was meant to point you to the Many videos that Howe has done with at least 6 different wheels and ball combinations and I agree with you in going to the casinos to find out yourself, on most Huxleys, the ball will tend to favour -2 to +12 without purchasing anything.
One last question to you Devilish;
Can Forester Beat Level Wheels as well as Tilted? No
Food for thought on who is the experts, seems to be a matter of Egos and not proof
I am not Peddling anything, I am saying that for a Man Like HOWE that has done so much for Roulette Computer technology, he should be respected especially when I have his device and know it works like you do with Foresters. Like yourself Devilish, I purchased someone’s device and found it to be accurate and a powerful tool. I also have Foresters which world differently and predicts late. I know it works, but in the casinos in the UK, foresters device is not much good, No more Bets is called and in Germany impossible to use.
I also spoke to one of Foresters Customers in Portugal who also favours Howes device. Its down to personal taste and preferences. All I am saying that their is much evidence.
As for the terminology Generic, Yes, they are, most wheels are around 80 cm in diameter, most have 8 Boats, most of them have a pocket that is a certain depth and width in relation to the distance from the circumference. most use balls that fall between 19mm and 22mm. Most produce scatter like in Howes videos from -2 to +12 of the strike point. What is strange is that generically the scatter is very similar. Its a fact Devilish its staring us all in the face. I have my own wheel ( Huxleys) and around 35 different roulette balls, and do you know what the scatter is on my wheel strangely enough? -2 to +12! This area contains the largest number of hits in a 15 pocket sector on my wheel. And please don’t reply with" so every time it falls between these values", no it does not, sometimes its 0 to +15 or +3 to +11, its dependent on how many spins I play in an evening. When I add all my results up over many many spins and average then out it is -2 to +12.