Here we calculated possible advantage based on ball jumps scatter. That would be truth if we can spotlessly predict each time number on which the ball would drop. In other words it would be a maximal advantage we can get based on ball jumps distribution without altering the jumps based on any other factors.
We can in some way combine these two charts, but if that will be what we can expect in reality i not know. Most chances - that not , because jumps from predicted diamond is not the same as jumps from not predicted diamond, jumps from DD after predicted is not the same as jumps from before predicted diamond.Here if simply we add 12 jump to every prediction, but as i said - not think that it will be near to reality
Best variant is when we predict actual number and mark how far real result is from prediction point
Then do we need jump charts for ball hits predicted D, chart ball hits earlier D and the chart when ball hits later D? If we predict ball drop using visual prediction we can’t have enough accurate information about ball speed.
If we predict using a roulette computer and if we have 4 vertical diamonds on the wheel we can have better information on which diamond the ball should drop and with which velocity.
It was compared to visual prediction, just a sentence earlier. VB has accuracy ~ 1 rotation, prediction often is based on overlap as 3/4 of rotation while RC in such case can definitely better decide. Point of comment is not what is better and for who, but is it worth using different scattergram for different ball speeds hitting the diamond.
It may not be the truth but it may be truth in most of the cases that the ball from each drop would behave with similar jumps scatter.
For that reason each ball drop point needs to have applied jumps chart multiplied by amount the ball drops at that point. Than add all results together for each jump divide by amount of spins in jump chart and we get chart as on the picture.
Black chart indicates total advantage for the player based on jumps and quality of predictions defined on 2 white charts on the left. It shows about 20% advantage over the casino.
The chart for prediction was from -18 to +18 but the data in the chart in XL is used as from 0-36 therefore for the exact answer all data on the black chart needs to be shifted by -18 pockets.
Here I will attach XL file you can use to add your own data.
You can add data only to cells light blue and green color, other cells are locked for protection.
This part is not clear. Looks like you repeat the same jump chart from each ball hit place, so is like sum of 100 charts data. If so then not clear why
divide by amount of spins in jump chart
What gives this operattion ?
Ok i look to all that more simple - possible simply mark final result, from some point - from these do chart or do some math elements and know which place is best to bet.
Prediction must point to that “best place” . There are no other variant to win only, bet that place which will be best in future.
Enough for that to use something from past or not… who knows … but anyway aim must be - predict place which will be best in future.
Better information, than what ?
I think are much cases, when without RC have better information. Say 7 vertical diamonds and 90% hits to two adjacent. In such situation can be that RC only will rise problems…
I often see that you about RC talk like about some professional player. RC is not professional player and it do only what YOU enter to it. Remember - YOU.
So in most cases RC play the same like play player - if player play good - RC helps much, but if not…then sorry, but it can do much damage…