# Bob Gordon system explained

“Forester,
Bob Gordons system, this is scam and I payed for that 1000 USD,he sayed that we should put street bet,if our predicition not comes,may be we have win from other street bet…
What a funny statement,and he sent me educational betting dvd as well,and I was shocked when I watched that dvd because,he lost all his money durinf the game just betting 3 units at 3 street bets… :))”

If compared to Laurence?s system which buy me also has very slim chance but even Laurance states 1 in 1000 will master it, but at least he has tools to detect specific parts in spin.

First, on tilted wheel to find only right revolution is not good enough, Bob even does not have method to find it so he will miss probably 50% of time.

Now if he finds it who says that all ball speeds will hit dominant diamond, that is probably again 50 % mistake. On top of that the ball with slightly different speed that will hit dominant diamond will not travel same time, so let?s say if there are 6 revolutions to the end, time of traveling for that 6 revolutions will change and of course rotor will not make same distance in traveling.
It produces error of about 10-12 numbers on fast rotor it could be more.

And for the end if you define that rotor is 3-3.5sec as he estimates.
Let mi show you what the difference to the end is.

37/3=12.3 numbers per sec if we have remaining 6 rotations it is about 10 sec. the rotor will make 12.3 x 10= 123 numbers until ball hits diamond.

If rotor is 3.5 sec then 37/3.5=10.5 numbers per sec. in 10 remaining sec. it is 105 numbers.
123-105=18 numbers difference.

Now add that to all the other possible errors and you will clearly understand why he recommends to play street bets and why you could not win with his system.

In his material Bob likes to compare his system with computer prediction.
It is obvious that he is not well informed. Good computer applied on tilted wheel taking care for everything that he probably does not understand and goes even in to scatter prediction. Of course he is completely wrong, believing that computer users must use only dominant diamond for clocking and that they must predict only last few revolutions.

Bob is nice man, I have his DVD spins collection and I am happy with that. He even sent me some extra spins.
I am sorry that I can not say same for his system.

If his system is selling for \$1000 as few pages on paper, how much is my Tilt2 really worth.
If takes care for everything listed as problems. With tilt2 there is no if or maybe but where system predicts the ball will hit there.

Some visual player may be interested it tnis
http://www.metronomewatch.com/

I wish to address the above post.
First, it is strange how this person starts off with poor English skills, yet finishes off with perfect English.

I am not an actor, dealer, nor do I practice or rehearse the production of any DVD, they are straight up first takes.

The Bet Styles DVD shows the following with the aim of doubling a bank;

3 Chips played each spin.
Low fret modern John Huxley single zero wheel.

Target number predicted at 6 spins to go, zero, ball lands on 16.
Target 31 lands 33
Target 21 lands 17
Target 17 lands 17
Target 29 lands 29
Target 21 lands 8
Target 4 lands 11
Target zero lands 26

At this stage the bank has now doubled and we have achieved what we set out to achieve.

4 more spins were made for the fun of it

Target 16 lands 24
Target 19 lands 30
Target 12 lands 2
Target 35 lands 30

With typical fluctuations the misses are quite acceptable and expected, yet in 12 spins we had 2 direct hits if we were just playing the one number.

The creator of this post then states that with Scotts method only 1 in 1,000 players could master it.
So that is not a scam, if mine is classed as one?

Obviously he cannot grasp what he is being taught and he is the only person that has ever supplied any negative feedback, even if it was not sent directly to me.

If there is something you do not understand you should contact me direct as was explained when you obtained the strategy.

If anybody wishes to see some genuine testimonials from players that do understand and have been playing for real drop me an email at:

[email protected]

Your reference to Roulette Computers are also a little strange considering we own the best and know exactly how it works and also where you can log from and also and when a prediction is made.

I suggest you contact me direct with your concerns.

I wish to address the above post.
First, it is strange how this person starts off with poor English skills, yet finishes off with perfect English.

Thanks Bob for so lovely comment about my English skill. First part is from my friend, and explanation is mine. You are first ever person that gave me that compliment.

The creator of this post then states that with Scott’s method only 1 in 1,000 players could master it.
So that is not a scam, if mine is classed as one?

Well I do not like Scotts system, it is too hard, but it has components which if mastered could produce advantage. And that is based on his 20 y old material. Yours one is new and it isn’t so good.

Obviously he cannot grasp what he is being taught and he is the only person that has ever supplied any negative feedback, even if it was not sent directly to me.

What are you talking about, few days after you found review you contact him and he clearly told you that he lost \$100 000 with your system. Is that negative enough for you or you need more?
I only helped him to understand why you system does not work.

If anybody wishes to see some genuine testimonials from players that do understand and have been playing for real drop me an email at:

[email protected]

Bob you come to wrong place with that, this forum is not used much only section with support.
It consists of skilled people and they all know everything about your system so you can not convince anybody.

Your reference to Roulette Computers are also a little strange considering we own the best and know exactly how it works and also where you can log from and also and when a prediction is made.

I suggest you contact me direct with your concerns.

Interesting, you have the best, I am only wondering how would you know what is the best.
In your material in few occasions you compared your system indicating that it performs better then computers. Well if your computer cannot do better then your system then do not say you have the best.

Yes I do have concern, when you will pay \$1000 back to my friend who bought your system.
You are claiming that you arte making millions, I do not ask you to refund his losses only money for system that he paid you. Now you exactly know who it is, you can pretend that you do not understand as much as you want. But you know that I know. So when you finish then you can contact me and we can talk as humans. Also for additional \$1000 I can spend some time with you and go step by step through your system and explain what needs to be done differently.

hello to everybody.

last week I got a letter (no email) from Bob Gordon. He is selling a new system to earn money over internet. Very strange.

He put many smart sentences into this letter. Not he developed or found something important, a friend of him did that. Sure. This friend earns about 1000 AUS\$/day. And always the same story. His friend and her want to sell it for 1000AUS\$, only limited for a period of time.

Original text :
“Basically, on his home computer he is selling certain items on the internet”

Theory is to buy cheap at the producer and sell high at the end customer, no middle men.

So my private theory is, that they are doing something with Spam mails. People in spamming community are earning many 100.000 US\$/year with sending Spam mails(medicine, Viagra, and so on…)
The goal is to send as many spam mails as possible. If there is only a feedback 1% from 100.000 mails, and again 1% will buy, they get a provision of 40% for each of those 10 products.

But sending spam mails is not legal. Cracking into computers. Zombie Server etc. etc.

Has anybody bought this theory from him, or who has experiences with it ?

Hexer