Better roulette computer testing

[quote=“Kelly, post:20, topic:139”]Hi Briver, well i haven`t seen that before lol. Was ir riding on the “third fret” i was talking about ?


Shot at 2007-06-27

You see, if the wheel head is rised 1/2 mm above flush, there will a small edge to overcome and the ball will easyer produce rollers.[/quote]

yes, that’s exactly the place where the ball continued the race for at least 10 rotaions more until the end of its energy, when due to the friction with rotor head (fret) started a very slow counter-rotation in same direction as rotor, but never fallen down to the pocket).
The whole scene lasted about 6-7 minutes before the inspectors intervention.

bye

Regarding the wheels with many diamonds.

Bruckner and Turek is an exception. It has 14 diamonds but only a middle strike to a vertical diamond will cause a normal drop. Any other strike will cause the ball to simply roll over the diamond and continue the orbit into a spiral until it hits the rotor and continue into a roller. I think the ratio is between 25 - 30% rollers despite the 14 diamonds.

The larger the diamonds the better.

I would agree with that 100%.
When MH talked about RRR devices used by casino I thought it could be simply change of rotor level.
There are simple things that I could not understand.
For example, observing wheel with almost 100% dominant diamond. I run home to bring lot of cash, but when I return only spinners and no tilt at all.

I would not call it war, it is simply, constructive analyses.