UWE Roulette VB Method

Roulette Visual Prediction
61

Another embarrassment for our super VB expert Kelly the fucking liar:

What i wrote on gambler’s glen:

“Oh God you are fabricating my claims, i will stop to talk with you, you do not understand what i say, it’s pathetic i have the illusion to talk with a 10 years old child:”

Kelly: “On a 3 sec wheel… you already know it is a 3 sec wheel, so why
on earth would you start tracking crossover numbers, to confirm it is
a 3 sec wheel (on top of that, your cross over pattern you look for is
already based on it being a 3 sec. wheel) at a point where you are ju
dging ball speed and is about to place your bets ? At that point you w
anna confirm the rotor speed with crossover numbers ?”

Me: "Again: By having made your drawing showing the deceleration of the ball on a 3 sec wheel rotor (yes you do several drawings with “different wheel speeds), you realize with the Vis Vis caused by the slight tilt of the wheel, even if the ball misses the diamond collision, you are still ON THE RIGHT SECTOR by betting on the opposite sectors separated by 180° when the ball is entering in his 5 last revolutions (EXAMPLE).”

HAHAHAHA! I was the first one in the thread to talk about the tilt of the wheel.
Now, because i shut your mouth in the first place, you continue to lie trying to get your point, but again SPLASH, your lies to discredit me are easily exposed.

I am waiting for your apologies now little Kelly. Just admit you were wrong about vis- -vis and that you have been lying about me (that i am a noob etc…).
After that, i will respect you and accept your apologies. Be an adult who recognize his faults.

62

Bago you sound funny,

Anyway with your vis- Vis (whoever start using such exotic name) and presented system, you will end up with where the prediction was or 180 from there or with 9 pockets from prediction or additional 180 from there. When you put it all together it means that the ball will stop at 0, or 90, or 180 or 270 from predicted number and of course anywhere in between.

Did you ever think to have correct prediction and forget of betting on opposite side just in case if ball decides to stop there? I believe in only one place to place the chips.

63

There are a lot of situations on semi-tilted wheels where betting 180° vis- -vis brings a higher edge than going for one unique sector.
And it is not your 0,0000001ms accuracy that will beat that, particularly when your super precise measurement is done with manual clicking, and when very similar ball revolution timings lead the ball to travel less or more distance.

So you should do your homework Forester.

64

There are a lot of situations on semi-tilted wheels where betting 180° vis- -

vis brings a higher edge than going for one unique sector.

I would really like you to explain us how.
Also I would like to see a graph that would show such case.

You are funny about roulette computers.
Even Barnetts basic formula will be more accurate then VB.
It will take him long time to adjust for particular time window but after that until parameters on the wheel change he will be more accurate then VB player.
He will be able to define ball speed at least within 40 ms. And he will not estimate rotor change but have more precised calculation.

Long time ago Kelly explained to me that he can do almost same with some additional processes on top of his VB prediction. It is logical but it requires a lot of skill and it compromises on remaining time for placing bets. But I can’t argue on it since it is possible.

One is for sure. Nothing can be more accurate and easier to adjust then FF tilt 2.
Did you watch video, and if you did do you think I edit it as your ex friend.

65

If you have never observed on semi-tilted wheels that the ball often misses the expected striked diamond to hit the diamond opposite, i cannot do anything for you.

It either means that you rarely visits Casinos.
Or
You just show ignorance to increase sells of your device.

66

I thought that I asked you something to explain.

that the ball often misses the expected striked diamond to hit the diamond opposite
With what you have wrote something is wrong. [u]If the ball hits opposite diamond then opposite number will not be there because while the ball makes extra ½ or rotation and rotor moved. [/u]

Even if it was who says that if ball doesn’t hit diamond where you expect advantage that it will hit on opposite side. The ball could hit any of diamonds, and by my experience opposite one will be with the lowest hits.

Bago you can read and read and chase people to explain to you.

But your understanding is very limited and often you misunderstand material.

Instead of explaining, you start attacking me for no reason.

If you want open another thread and write which kind of A/H I am or anything you have said about me inpatst 2 years when you were helping Stefano. I do not care.

But if you discussing something try to focus on the subject.
Even if i have the worst roulette computer it has nothing to do with your explanatio to be more right.

I think you should buy again Stefano’s computer, didn’t you read it does everything automatically. So theoretically even idiot can operate it.

67

It is already all explained but you seem not to understand anything. 180° vis vis is wheel dependant and to actually be right into the spot, no matter if the wheel hits predicted diamond or opposite 180°, you will be right by betting split bets as 5/8 23/26 0/3.
180° vis vis betting works with a rotor speed around 3sec.

So now, if you claim that your “unique sector betting” is more accurate when facing those standard conditions, you are more silly than i thought.

With vis vis betting you are actually covering two areas that have peak points in the scatter, so it is mathematically impossible to achieve a better edge by covering only one sector like you precognize, since both sectors have equal chances to hit.

I don’t attack you but you are quite boring because we are talking about basic things and you don’t understand.
But like you are saying, it is not you the problem, it is the others. We are all silly.

I just told you that your computer cannot achieve a better edge on semi-tilted wheels by betting only one sector whereas in the scatter graph, there is not only 1 large strike area but severals.

If you still do not understand, do not ask me. Email Basieux and he might take the time to explain it to you, it is him who is the precursor of this. He has a maths and physics degree, therefore if vis- -vis was not usefull, do you really think he would have explained this in a lot of his books and using it himself at the table winning large amounts of money.

Be more respectful of what people has to say. You are like Kelly who always wants to be right and as you’ve seen i’ve embarrassed him and exposed his lies.

Why are you talking again about roulette computers when i have said many many times that i didn’t want and i’m not interested in using one for playing in the real world?.
You are just getting crazy because i’ve proven my point with people wanting to sell your cheap device, and i got it for peanuts. But contrary to Stefano, i won’t have to ask you for a refund, it is so cheap.

68

No, I will not ask you for more be sure.

First you say that you place opposite bets because ball hits on opposite diamond forgetting about rotor movement.

It is very hard to define what semi tilted wheel is since all of them really are tilted up to the point and none 100%. Stefano calls maximum leveled wheel semi tilted.

Did you ever ask yourself why do you have 2 or more pick points and why I always have one?

Playing 2 pick points if they are same in size doesn’t increase advantage but consistency of hits.

If you play 2 points and split $50 on them, someone will have same result simply by placing $50 on one of them. And I will have the highest advantage because all picks will be at one point higher I size.

Only excuse for 2 or more pick points is if ball scatter is formatted that way. If it is not then the only reason is your bad prediction.
If you have small 4 pick points as a result of predictiong what I will call a leveled wheel with tilted wheel approach, it will be very low points, it will not be stable and hardly that any advantage can be gained from it even if the player has perfect feeling for rotor adjustments.

Yes you proved your point it must be that hundreds of people rushing to sell you ff , so I will end up with you here. When you grow up and decide to be an honest contributor let me know. Just do not make it to be to soon because from your levele of respect and responsibility it will be imposiable to improve.

And if someone is interested here is your prove.
http://rouletteplace.com/index.php/topic,533.0.html

Bago karma come to -10 points he is banned from posting his comments.

69

hi forester are you awake?

70

good replay to this post c :o

71

I test the UWE document with a wheel with out arms and find out that you can key a visual pattern more early into the spin development then what the original does - but still based upon the same original principals with a twist.

Just wanted to mention it as i regard old traditional visual reads as hobby and like to master them as any other visual ballistic method i know of.

One thing i have not test - but i assume it would work is VB2 where certain rotor speeds will key around 2.0 time intervall with the cadence ( my chart say rotor 3.0 and time intervall 2.38 ) and some around 1.0 and other values - then some one could develop a head count with 1.0 and 1.5 and play a wide spreed of rotor speeds - as i assume with out testing it yet that with around the 2.0 bench mark cadence some one just read the reference numbers but use the opposite number and apply the time intervall of 1.0 sec - correct me if i am wrong - but i assume with out been able to test VB2 yet.
It should work and with a 5 to 9 pocket marginal + - 0.

Any comment on that Forester?
The bi-modal read is a estimation and PM you the chart.

Cheers

72

where do i learn the "visual prediction?

73

Reading posts as
http://rouletteplace.com/index.php?topic=1019.0
Thinking, practicing, and adopting something that suits you.
There are also some people selling explanations about VB.

74

would any1 be so kind and upload UWE’s Method (in german or english) again?

The link doesn’t seem 2 b working :frowning:

thank you!