Prediction zap concept

Advanced roulette play
21

Fair enough, im not gonna argue that VB is not hard work because it is. But i would rather scout for a potential good wheel and analyse it to death and then hit it with maximum bets for a short while and leave when the winnings adds up to the time spend and overheads is well covered. Finding a potential good wheel might take 2 - 3 casinos but in my part of the world it takes 1 - 2 days to do it. So a session is gonna take 3 - 4 days including the actual play.

  1. Scout for a potential good wheel.

  2. Track it and analyse it with ALL possible software until a map of possible defects, incl. tilt degree, scatter types versus wheel speeds, number and sector analyses, number strenght prediction strenght versus possible wheel defects etc.

  3. Play the best playing model showing the highest SD with at least + 4SD after checking that the wheel and number ring has not been rotated.

A total playing session might last 6 - 800 spins, where there are some 150 - 200 placed bets that on average will throw off some 100 - 150 units. The unit size should have a size so that 3 days of track/play should throw off a minimum of 4.5 times a daily normal salary (1.5 pr day) so that hotel and travel costs are covered.

I haven`t come across anyone so far that could just go and play any wheel with 20 - 30 learning spins and achieve a hit rate of 1:18 or 1:15 oe whatever the claims has been over the years.

This kind of play doesn`t work for holiday play, but is more like hard work.

22

Kelly you are may be correct, but I do not do it that way.
I also do not have 1:15 all the time, it is possible advantage. It could be even more but in usual when all is added it is much less.

With roulette leveled wheel play I can’t know just by observation can I have advantage or not.
I have to be there, clock spins then observe if I have consistency or not. For me finding consistency (prediction €“ rotor hit) is same as for VB player finding out that wheel has strong dominant zone. Instead of just watching if I play most likely I can get something in return.
There is no way that I will play or watch the wheel for hours. From your 800 spins you would play only 1/4 of spins, and I would play all 800. On the end it comes to same.

If we look what is the best way then we need to refer to Ritz team people play.
They achieved the most.

They do not take hours to define do they have advantage or not, they also may play smaller amounts at start. When they find that they have advantage, they play table limit until they can stand on their legs or until casino stops them.
That may easy be 24 hours of continues play. It is because once they cash in, next day they wouldn’t be welcome.
I can’t play VB or FF for longer then 3 hours. They drink red bull to stay awake I drink bourbon and coke to have fun. And you and I know that narrowing played sector increases advantage, but I still prefer to play it wider. I never said that my way of play is professional.
I only said it gives me profit.

I see it this way
My FF’s prediction on leveled wheel probably results same as VB prediction on tilted wheel. FF’s prediction on tilted wheel with all my experiences showed much higher returns.

You are right my played sample of 50-60 spins many times may not be enough.
Anything can happen. I have experienced where 90% of spins ended within 16 pockets of prediction but I still ended up with loses. Or where after first 10 spins I find out that I was wrong so I have to change it so after 20 spins I use different offset. (In usual it is enough if I am already familiar with ball behavior). Those spins are only to define failing point correctly.
There is always possibility of some bad luck or mistakes. But if on long run there is more “good luck” and proper decision that isn’t problem at all.

Take a look at Mikes board......oh oh .... Shortly Strip Crusher and other nicks will turn up on the GG, shooting at forester.

Once more, you were right; I messed up businesses of roulette mobile phone / PDA scammers. They must be happy now.

23
I received a device from forester about five months ago; I tested it against some reference spins in Tilt2 mode to get a feel for it and to produce my initial "first take" report. It predicted perfectly and produced close to 100% predictions.

Survteck, that is imposable you simply can’t get close to 100% predictions on tilted wheel.
You really sometimes look as you do not read what I write. Tilted wheel prediction will probably reject 40 % of spins. Further more all controls and check points for timings and error corrections are same as on leveled wheel. It is imposable to get more spins predicted on tilted wheel.

I provided the testers with all the information which forester provides to you so the testers, for all intents and purposes, were just another FF purchaser who happened to have a casino at their disposal.

No, you did not; none of them contacted me and asked for help. None of them gave me feedback what system is telling them. All you told me is that you getting only 20% in accuracy 3 setting where you should get close to 100%. You can have accurate prediction if you getting only 20%. The curve of ball deceleration can’t be formed properly. You also told me that in accuracy 3 you do not get last zap, which is imposable.

So, this is the bottom line, the testers could not get an edge, they did not feel that the device was practical to use as it stands and that predictions were way too late.

Bingo, this tells me a lot. Survteck , you didn’t test it on modern leveled wheel as you call it.
You’ve test it on old crappy wheel where the ball decelerates to fast. That I why I asked you with how many pulses system respond after settings and you never responded. New modern wheels have much slower ball deceleration and all it can happen is that prediction can be too early. Not too late. Maybe your wheel is new I do not know but definitely it doesn’t come within FF’s specification. Wheel where ball drops to fast isn’t good for prediction same as wheel where the ball goes forever. Only few days ago I did explain why. If the ball of one sec/ rotation drops in 5 sec there is nothing that we can do. Only idiot may try to clock ball at 0.5 sec to get earlier prediction.

Now, this does not mean that the device is not capable of doing as forester claims, it simply means that the tests carried out on the device did not raise concern to the people who's money you are trying to take.
It means only that you and your testers are overconfident and arrogant, and probably missing basics. Or you are completely out of order.
I would be happy to cover all expenses for any credible person who would like to attend the casino to demonstrate the device under the same conditions as our tests.

Dream babe dream. But if you can organize that publicly in Brisbane or Gold coast I would like to be there as anonymous observer.

Alternatively visit Stefano he had with FF 67% predictions and 1:15 hit rate. It is only 31 spin but at least he could get predictions.
He did not have problems as your experienced clickers. He only had problem observing ball at moment of zap because he used wrong clocking position and because it was his objective to show FF as unpractical. Survtch, you perfectly know how much Stefano loves me, but in his attempt to discredit me he simply couldn’t make the FF to predict wrong.

You exceed him, you claim that it doesn’t predict and when predict it predicts wrong.
Did you ever ask yourself how Stefano could get 67%, hear what I am saying or some other people here that we are getting close to 100%? Are you trying to say that Stefano would cheat to show FF predicting more spins.

24

Survtech,

Trying to master FF takes a lot more than a crash course that your so called testers are trying to do.

Lets be honest. We know that these testers aren’t spending hours and hours every day trying to master FF. there is just to many technical factors about FF these testers can not and will not know about.

Lets face it, these casino personnel might make good 9 to 5’ers working in a casino, but when it comes to trying to fully understand FF and mastering FF - – these people are not close- - - NOT EVEN CLOSE. So what ever their findings - - is totally discredited…

SERVTECH YOU WROTE “I would be happy to cover all expenses for any credible person who would like to attend the casino to demonstrate the device under the same conditions as our tests.”

WHO WOULD THAT BENEFIT? WHAT PURPOSE WOULD THAT SERVE? IF THEY ARE NOT SMART ENOUGH TO FIGURE IT OUT ON THEIR OWN - - THAN THAT’S ON THEM…

YOU EXPECT ONE OF US TO COME TO THE CASINO TO SHOW THEM THE CORRECT WAY HOW TO USE FF. SURVTECH, YOU MUST HAVE LOST YOUR DA _ _ MIND.

and it’s not their money. It’s company funds not coming out of their pocket - - these people are on a fixed salary - - - so regardless of how much a particular casino makes or losses - - will not affect these testers paychecks.

I know how the average 9 to 5 worker thinks. They are disgusted that they have more work to do on account of you, since they do not get paid extra for this since they are on a straight salary. That’s how the average 9 to 5 worker thinks thats all ready on a straight salary- - - pissed off when they are given more work to do. I bet most of them all ready felt that they were over worked and underpaid, and now they are thinking to themselves" - -“OH GREAT - - NOW WE GET TO BE MORE OVER WORKED”.

Most the employees in the casino that feel this way AND MOST OF THEM DO, deep down are very happy when the casino losses money as long as it’s not from their table, and feel that it’s justice being served , since they are not getting EVEN 1 MILLIONTH OF A SMALL PORTION of the extra winnings coming in, THEY DON’T WANT TO SEE THE CASINO TAKE IN THE EXTRA PROFIT EITHER.

THEY( CASINO EMPLOYEES) HAVE A VALID POINT - - WHY SHOULD CASINO’S CONTINUE TO GET RICHER AND RICHER - - - WHILE THE EMPLOYEES ARE STUCK ON THE SAME STUPID FIXED SALARY YEAR AFTER YEAR WITH RAISES SO SMALL THAT IT’S A BIG JOKE?

ANSWER ME THAT BIG BOY 8)

25

@ Dr. Spock
He did not even come to point where he needs to understand the FF how to get maximum of it. Instead of reading what I am writing and trying to understand my broken English to solve problem, he becomes very ironic. Fist with nanoseconds now with accusation that I made system for wheels which casino still didn’t make.

Survtech, first of all, the FF is very accurate measuring device.
As such I used it first not to predict but to store clocked data directly from casino wheels.

After collecting all I need I designed IQE6 to be perfectly balanced in centre with reasonable tolerance. If you think that on most casino wheels the all will not be within FF’s tolerance you need to do more research.

Mate, I got a bit tired getting all the time accused for something not logical, from people
who on their page have roulette PDA or mobile phone for sale with 4 digits price.
If anybody is polite here that is me. You are only discrediting yourself and if you insist I may be able to help you with that. Just let me know.

Do you know what makes you look funny?

Stefano’s Hourmouzis video.

Why don’t you ask him how did he get reasonable amount of predictions.
You are friendly with him, didn’t you say that first time you removed review when was positive because he called you by phone and complained.

Stefano is also funny. He already added your latest review to his RSR site even it is contradicting to his explanation.
One is claiming he can’t see the ball at moment of zap but that system has advantage and he even made video on which he has reasonable amount of predictions. You are claiming you can’t make system predict and when predicts it gives random results. Are you out of your mind?
Oh yes and Mark Howe is claiming that FF predicts only 3 sec to the end.

Can you 3 synchronies better.